Process MiningApplication · Ibm

CVE-2025-36016

HIGH · 8.2 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-06-21
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
89/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM Process Mining 2.0.1 IF001 and 2.0.1 could allow a remote attacker to conduct phishing attacks, using an open redirect attack. By persuading a victim to visit a specially crafted Web site, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to spoof the URL displayed to redirect a user to a malicious Web site that would appear to be trusted. This could allow the attacker to obtain highly sensitive information or conduct further attacks against the victim.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

IBM Process Mining versions 2.0.1 IF001 and 2.0.1 contain an open redirect vulnerability where the application fails to properly validate redirect URLs. An attacker can craft malicious links that appear to originate from the trusted IBM domain but redirect users to attacker-controlled malicious websites, enabling phishing attacks and credential theft.

MitigationImplement strict URL validation for all redirect endpoints, preferably using an allowlist of permitted domains. Remove or disable any dynamic redirect functionality that accepts user-supplied URLs without validation.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Process MiningApplication
Affected:= 2.0.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify IBM Process Mining version
    Locate the installed IBM Process Mining version through the product administration console, about page, or installation metadata. Common locations include the admin dashboard, version info in the UI, or installation logs.
    Affected if The installed version matches 2.0.1 (specifically IF001 build)
  2. Locate redirect endpoints
    Review application configuration and routing definitions for any endpoints that accept a URL parameter and perform a redirect. Look for parameters commonly named 'redirect', 'url', 'next', 'target', or similar in the web application routes.
    Affected if The application contains redirect functionality that accepts user-supplied URLs without verification
  3. Inspect redirect URL validation
    Examine the code or configuration handling redirect requests. Check if URL validation exists and whether it allows arbitrary external domains or only permits internal/allowlisted destinations.
    Affected if No validation or only weak validation (e.g., checking for presence of the trusted domain name) is implemented on redirect parameters
  4. Test redirect behavior
    If you have a test environment, submit a crafted request with an external domain in the redirect parameter (e.g., redirect=https://attacker.com) and observe if the application redirects to the supplied URL.
    Affected if The application redirects to arbitrary external domains supplied in the redirect parameter

You are affected if IBM Process Mining version 2.0.1 IF001 is installed AND the application has redirect functionality that accepts user-controlled URLs without proper allowlist-based validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement strict URL validation for all redirect endpoints, preferably using an allowlist of permitted domains. Remove or disable any dynamic redirect functionality that accepts user-supplied URLs without validation.

Fix this in Process Mining Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-36016 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-36016 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data