CVE-2025-36056
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM System Storage Virtualization Engine TS7700 3957 VED R5.4 8.54.2.17, R6.0 8.60.0.115, 3948 VED R5.4 8.54.2.17, R6.0 8.60.0.115, and 3948 VEF R6.0 8.60.0.115 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an authenticated user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStored XSS vulnerability in IBM TS7700 Web UI allows authenticated users to inject arbitrary JavaScript that executes in browsers of other users viewing the affected interface, potentially exposing credentials or session data within trusted sessions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 8.54.2.17<= 8.60.0.115<= 8.54.2.17<= 8.60.0.115<= 8.60.0.115CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify your IBM TS7700 modelLocate the model number on the physical device or in the system administration interface - look for IBM 3957 or IBM 3948 designationsAffected if The model is a 3957 Ved, 3948 Ved, or 3948 Vef
-
Check the installed firmware versionAccess the system management interface or use the appropriate CLI command to retrieve the firmware version; compare it against the affected ranges: <= 8.54.2.17 or <= 8.60.0.115Affected if The firmware version is 8.54.2.17 or lower, or 8.60.0.115 or lower for the 8.60.x branch
-
Verify the Web UI is enabledCheck the TS7700 configuration settings to confirm the Web UI interface is currently active and accessibleAffected if The Web UI is enabled and reachable over the network
-
Review Web UI input fields for stored scriptsExamine the Web UI for any user-controllable input fields (such as user profiles, labels, or configuration parameters) and inspect stored values for unexpected script tags or JavaScript code patternsAffected if Any stored XSS payloads or suspicious script content exist in Web UI input fields
You are affected if you run an IBM 3957 or 3948 with Ved or Vef firmware at version 8.54.2.17 or below, or 8.60.0.115 or below, and the Web UI is enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply IBM-provided patches for TS7700 R5.4 and R6.0; until patch availability, implement output encoding and input validation on Web UI endpoints, and enforce Content Security Policy headers.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,144.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-36056 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-36056 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data