CVE-2025-36359
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM DevOps Automation 1.0.1 and IBM DevOps Loop 1.0.2 does not invalidate session IDs after expiration which could allow an authenticated user to impersonate another user on the system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIBM DevOps Automation 1.0.1 and IBM DevOps Loop 1.0.2 fail to invalidate session IDs after expiration. An authenticated attacker who obtains a previously valid session ID can continue using it beyond its intended lifetime to impersonate other users on the system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0.1= 1.0.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed product and versionLocate the installed version of IBM DevOps Automation or IBM DevOps Loop using the product's version information command or administrative interfaceAffected if The installed version is exactly 1.0.1 for DevOps Automation or exactly 1.0.2 for DevOps Loop
-
Locate session configurationFind session management configuration files or settings within the product's administration console or configuration directoryAffected if Session timeout settings exist but no explicit invalidation logic is defined
-
Verify session expiration behaviorCreate an active session, wait for timeout or manually expire it, then attempt to reuse the original session ID to perform authenticated actionsAffected if The expired session ID continues to work and authenticates successfully after the defined timeout period
-
Check session token storageExamine session token storage mechanisms (such as cookies, server-side session stores, or token databases) to determine if expired entries are being removed or marked as invalidAffected if Expired session records remain accessible or are not marked as invalidated in the session store
A user is affected if they are running exactly version 1.0.1 of IBM DevOps Automation or exactly version 1.0.2 of IBM DevOps Loop and expired session IDs remain valid beyond their intended lifetime.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper session expiration and invalidation logic to ensure session IDs are invalidated immediately upon timeout or logout, and consider implementing session rotation upon authentication to prevent session fixation.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-36359 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-36359 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data