CVE-2025-36436
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation 25.0.0 through 25.0.0 Interim Fix 002, 24.0.1 through 24.0.1 Interim Fix 005, and 24.0.0 through 24.0.0 Interim Fix 007 is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an authenticated user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceStored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation Web UI allows authenticated users to inject arbitrary JavaScript code that persists on the server and executes in browsers of other users viewing the affected content, potentially leading to session hijacking and credential disclosure.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 24.0.0= 24.0.1= 25.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation versionRun the command to retrieve the installed version of IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation, typically via the oc get icpa4bcommand or by checking the operator deployment version in your Kubernetes environment.Affected if The installed version equals 24.0.0, 24.0.1, or 25.0.0 exactly.
-
Verify Web UI component is exposedCheck if the Web UI component is accessible and not disabled. Review the service configuration and ingress/expose settings to confirm the IBM Business Automation Workflow Web UI is reachable.Affected if The Web UI is exposed and accessible to authenticated users.
-
Review user-submitted content storage locationsInspect the database or content storage for the Web UI where user-generated content is persisted, such as form submissions, comments, or profile fields. Look for any unexpected script tags or JavaScript payloads.Affected if Any stored content contains unsanitized HTML or JavaScript code that could execute in other user browsers.
-
Check application logs for XSS injection attemptsSearch the application and web server logs for patterns indicative of XSS injection attempts, such as <script>, javascript:, onerror=, onload=, or other HTML event handlers in request parameters.Affected if Logs contain repeated XSS injection patterns targeting the Web UI endpoints.
You are affected if your IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation version is exactly 24.0.0, 24.0.1, or 25.0.0 AND the Web UI is enabled and accessible to authenticated users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the appropriate IBM interim fix: IF002 for version 25.0.0, IF005 for version 24.0.1, or IF007 for version 24.0.0. Additionally, implement output encoding and input validation on affected UI components.
Apply the appropriate Interim Fix (IF) for your version: 25.0.0-IF002+, 24.0.1-IF005+, or 24.0.0-IF007+
- 1. Identify the exact version of IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation currently installed by checking the CP4BA deployment configuration and version information.
- 2. For version 25.0.0: Apply Interim Fix 002 or later (e.g., 25.0.0-IF003 or newer if available).
- 3. For version 24.0.1: Apply Interim Fix 005 or later (e.g., 24.0.1-IF006 or newer if available).
- 4. For version 24.0.0: Apply Interim Fix 007 or later (e.g., 24.0.0-IF008 or newer if available).
- 5. Obtain the interim fix from IBM Fix Central (https://www.ibm.com/support/fixcentral) by searching for the specific CVE or the interim fix number.
- 6. Follow IBM's standard process for applying interim fixes to Cloud Pak for Business Automation, which typically involves updating the operator deployment with the new fix package.
- 7. After applying the fix, verify the patch was successfully installed by checking the version/fix level in the deployment.
- 8. Test the Web UI functionality to confirm the XSS fix does not introduce regressions.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-36436 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-36436 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data