CVE-2025-39775
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/mremap: fix WARN with uffd that has remap events disabled Registering userfaultd on a VMA that spans at least one PMD and then mremap()'ing that VMA can trigger a WARN when recovering from a failed page table move due to a page table allocation error. The code ends up doing the right thing (recurse, avoiding moving actual page tables), but triggering that WARN is unpleasant: WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 6133 at mm/mremap.c:357 move_normal_pmd mm/mremap.c:357 [inline] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 6133 at mm/mremap.c:357 move_pgt_entry mm/mremap.c:595 [inline] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 6133 at mm/mremap.c:357 move_page_tables+0x3832/0x44a0 mm/mremap.c:852 Modules linked in: CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 6133 Comm: syz.0.19 Not tainted 6.17.0-rc1-syzkaller-00004-g53e760d89498 #0 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:move_normal_pmd mm/mremap.c:357 [inline] RIP: 0010:move_pgt_entry mm/mremap.c:595 [inline] RIP: 0010:move_page_tables+0x3832/0x44a0 mm/mremap.c:852 Code: ... RSP: 0018:ffffc900037a76d8 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000032930007 RCX: ffffffff820c6645 RDX: ffff88802e56a440 RSI: ffffffff820c7201 RDI: 0000000000000007 RBP: ffff888037728fc0 R08: 0000000000000007 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000032930007 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffffc900037a79a8 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: dffffc0000000000 FS: 000055556316a500(0000) GS:ffff8880d68bc000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000001b30863fff CR3: 0000000050171000 CR4: 0000000000352ef0 Call Trace: <TASK> copy_vma_and_data+0x468/0x790 mm/mremap.c:1215 move_vma+0x548/0x1780 mm/mremap.c:1282 mremap_to+0x1b7/0x450 mm/mremap.c:1406 do_mremap+0xfad/0x1f80 mm/mremap.c:1921 __do_sys_mremap+0x119/0x170 mm/mremap.c:1977 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x4c0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f00d0b8ebe9 Code: ... RSP: 002b:00007ffe5ea5ee98 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000019 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f00d0db5fa0 RCX: 00007f00d0b8ebe9 RDX: 0000000000400000 RSI: 0000000000c00000 RDI: 0000200000000000 RBP: 00007ffe5ea5eef0 R08: 0000200000c00000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000002 R13: 00007f00d0db5fa0 R14: 00007f00d0db5fa0 R15: 0000000000000005 </TASK> The underlying issue is that we recurse during the original page table move, but not during the recovery move. Fix it by checking for both VMAs and performing the check before the pmd_none() sanity check. Add a new helper where we perform+document that check for the PMD and PUD level. Thanks to Harry for bisecting.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysisA detailed technical summary for this CVE is being prepared.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.12.11, < 6.13>= 6.13.1, < 6.16.4= 6.13= 6.17CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.136.16.4
Linux kernel 6.16.4 or later (or latest stable in 6.12.y/6.13.y/6.14.y/6.15.y/6.16.y series)
- 1. Identify the current running kernel version using 'uname -r' or 'cat /proc/version'
- 2. Check if the system is running an affected version: 6.12.11 through 6.12.x, 6.13.x, 6.13.1-6.16.3, or exactly 6.17
- 3. Update the Linux kernel package to version 6.16.4 or later, or to a version that includes the fix commit 772e5b4a5e8360743645b9a466842d16092c4f94
- 4. For distributions using point releases (e.g., 6.12.y, 6.13.y, 6.14.y, 6.15.y, 6.16.y), ensure the latest stable kernel in that series is installed
- 5. Reboot the system to load the patched kernel
- 6. Verify the fix is applied by checking the kernel version and confirming the mremap.c code no longer triggers the WARN in move_normal_pmd
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-39775 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-39775 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data