CVE-2025-40797
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC PCS neo V4.1 (All versions), SIMATIC PCS neo V5.0 (All versions), SIMATIC PCS neo V6.0 (All versions < V6.0 SP1 Update 1), User Management Component (UMC) (All versions < V2.15.1.3). Affected products contain a out-of-bounds read vulnerability in the integrated UMC component. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause a denial of service condition.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn out-of-bounds read vulnerability exists in the User Management Component (UMC) of SIMATIC PCS neo. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability to cause a denial of service condition on affected systems.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.1= 5.0< 2.15.1.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if SIMATIC PCS neo is installedLook for SIMATIC PCS neo installation directories or check Windows Programs and Features for 'SIMATIC PCS neo' entry. Check version displayed there.Affected if Version listed is 4.1 or 5.0 (the affected versions).
-
Identify User Management Component (UMC) versionCheck the installed version of the Siemens User Management Component. This is typically found in the UMC admin console, or in Windows Programs and Features as 'Siemens User Management Component' or similar. Run the UMC diagnostic tool if available, or check version info on UMC service files.Affected if UMC version is lower than 2.15.1.3.
-
Verify UMC service is running and exposedCheck if the UMC service (typically listens on port 443 or 8443 for web-based UMC) is running and accessible from the network. Use netstat or similar tool to check for listening UMC-related services.Affected if UMC service is running and accessible on network ports (indicates potential exposure to unauthenticated attackers).
-
Confirm UMC web interface is reachableAttempt to access the UMC login page via HTTP/HTTPS from a remote location or check access logs for external connection attempts to the UMC endpoint.Affected if UMC web interface is reachable from untrusted networks.
You are affected if SIMATIC PCS neo V4.1 or V5.0 is installed, OR if the User Management Component version is below 2.15.1.3 and the UMC service is network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.15.1.3
Upgrade SIMATIC PCS neo to V6.0 SP1 Update 1 or later, and UMC to V2.15.1.3 or later. As an interim measure, restrict network access to the UMC interface and implement network segmentation to limit exposure.
SIMATIC PCS neo V6.0 SP1 Update 1; UMC V2.15.1.3
- 1. Identify the currently installed version of SIMATIC PCS neo or User Management Component (UMC)
- 2. For SIMATIC PCS neo V6.0: Upgrade to V6.0 SP1 Update 1 or later
- 3. For User Management Component (UMC): Upgrade to V2.15.1.3 or later
- 4. For SIMATIC PCS neo V4.1 and V5.0: Contact Siemens technical support for available remediation options, as the advisory lists 'All versions' as affected without specifying a fixed release
- 5. After upgrading, verify the UMC component version matches the expected fixed version
- 6. Test that the UMC service starts correctly and normal authentication flows work
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,432.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-40797 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-40797 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data