macOSOperating system · Apple

CVE-2025-43506

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-12-12
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 26.1 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A logic error was addressed with improved error handling. This issue is fixed in macOS Tahoe 26.1. iCloud Private Relay may not activate when more than one user is logged in at the same time.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A logic error in macOS causes iCloud Private Relay to fail activation when more than one user is logged in simultaneously. The bug stems from improper error handling that incorrectly processes the multi-user session state, preventing the privacy feature from initializing despite being available and enabled.

MitigationUpdate macOS to version Tahoe 26.1 or later, which contains the corrected error handling logic for iCloud Private Relay multi-user scenarios.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
macOSOperating system
Affected:< 26.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed macOS version
    Go to Apple menu > About This Mac and note the macOS version number (e.g., 26.0, 25.4, etc.)
    Affected if Version is earlier than 26.1 (e.g., 26.0, 25.x, 24.x)
  2. Verify iCloud Private Relay is enabled
    Open System Settings > Apple ID > iCloud > Private Relay and confirm the toggle is turned on
    Affected if Private Relay shows as enabled but fails to initialize or activate
  3. Check for multiple logged-in users
    Open System Settings > Users & Groups to see if more than one user account exists, or use the command 'who' in Terminal to list currently logged-in users
    Affected if Multiple user sessions are active simultaneously on the system
  4. Confirm Private Relay activation failure
    Observe the Private Relay status in System Settings - it may show as unavailable, fail to load, or display an error despite being enabled
    Affected if Private Relay is enabled but shows as unavailable or fails to activate, especially in multi-user environments

You are affected if running macOS versions earlier than 26.1, have multiple users logged in simultaneously, and iCloud Private Relay fails to activate despite being enabled.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 26.1 or later
Fixed in 26.1
Interim mitigation

Update macOS to version Tahoe 26.1 or later, which contains the corrected error handling logic for iCloud Private Relay multi-user scenarios.

Recommended fix High confidence

macOS Tahoe 26.1

  1. 1. Back up your Mac using Time Machine or another backup solution before upgrading.
  2. 2. Ensure your Mac is connected to power and has sufficient storage space.
  3. 3. Open System Settings (or System Preferences on older macOS).
  4. 4. Navigate to General > Software Update.
  5. 5. Check for updates - macOS Tahoe 26.1 should appear as available.
  6. 6. Click "Download and Install" to download and apply the macOS Tahoe 26.1 update.
  7. 7. Follow any on-screen prompts and restart when requested.
  8. 8. After updating, verify the version by going to System Settings > General > About and confirming the version shows 26.1 or later.
Caveat Standard macOS upgrade precautions apply - back up data before upgrading; some legacy applications may not be compatible with new macOS versions

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in macOS Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
5.0 hours of engineering $860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-43506 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-43506 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data