Dir 605l FirmwareOperating system · Dlink

CVE-2025-46176

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-05-23
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
74/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Hardcoded credentials in the Telnet service in D-Link DIR-605L v2.13B01 and DIR-816L v2.06B01 allow attackers to remotely execute arbitrary commands via firmware analysis.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Hardcoded credentials are present in the Telnet service firmware of D-Link DIR-605L (v2.13B01) and DIR-816L (v2.06B01) routers. Attackers can extract these credentials through firmware analysis and use them to gain unauthorized remote access, enabling arbitrary command execution on the affected devices.

MitigationApply available firmware updates from D-Link to remove hardcoded credentials; if no update exists, disable the Telnet service entirely and use secure remote management alternatives.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Dir 605l FirmwareOperating system
Affected:= 2.13b01
Dir 816l FirmwareOperating system
Affected:= 2.06b01

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the router model and firmware version
    Log into the router's web interface and check the Status or Firmware Upgrade page for the exact model number and firmware version. Alternatively, check the label on the device itself or use the router's admin panel to view system information.
    Affected if The firmware version matches exactly 2.13B01 for DIR-605L or 2.06B01 for DIR-816L.
  2. Confirm the Telnet service is accessible
    Attempt to connect to the router's IP address on TCP port 23 using a Telnet client (e.g., telnet <router_ip>) to see if the Telnet service is listening and responding.
    Affected if The Telnet service accepts connections on the router, indicating it is enabled and accessible.
  3. Check if default or hardcoded Telnet credentials work
    Try logging into the Telnet service using common default credentials or any credentials known to be associated with this firmware version. Note: Do not attempt unauthorized access; this check is for authorized defenders on their own networks.
    Affected if Authentication succeeds with credentials that were not set by the administrator, confirming the presence of hardcoded credentials.
  4. Extract and analyze firmware for hardcoded credentials
    If you have access to the firmware file (download from D-Link support site or extract from device), use binwalk or similar tools to extract the filesystem, then search binary files or configuration files for hardcoded usernames/passwords strings associated with the Telnet service.
    Affected if The firmware analysis reveals embedded credentials that are not user-configurable and are present in the Telnet service component.

A user is affected if they are running firmware version 2.13B01 on DIR-605L or version 2.06B01 on DIR-816L, and the Telnet service is enabled and accessible with hardcoded credentials.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply available firmware updates from D-Link to remove hardcoded credentials; if no update exists, disable the Telnet service entirely and use secure remote management alternatives.

Fix this in Dir 605l Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-46176 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-46176 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data