CVE-2025-46359
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA path traversal issue exists in backup and restore feature of multiple versions of PowerCMS. A product administrator may execute arbitrary code by restoring a crafted backup file.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA path traversal vulnerability exists in the backup and restore feature of PowerCMS. An authenticated product administrator can restore a crafted backup file containing path traversal sequences (e.g., ../../../') to write files to arbitrary locations on the server, leading to arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 4.0, < 4.61>= 5.0, < 5.31>= 6.0, < 6.71CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify PowerCMS installation versionLocate the version file or admin dashboard that displays the PowerCMS version number. Common locations include: version file in the installation directory, footer of admin pages, or system information panel.Affected if The installed version is >= 4.0 and < 4.61, OR >= 5.0 and < 5.31, OR >= 6.0 and < 6.71
-
Confirm backup and restore feature is enabledAccess the admin panel and navigate to the backup/restore section, typically found under System Settings, Maintenance, or Tools. Check if the backup and restore functionality is present and accessible.Affected if The backup/restore feature is enabled and accessible in the admin interface
-
Verify administrator account accessCheck if any user accounts with administrator-level privileges exist in the system. This vulnerability requires an authenticated product administrator.Affected if There are active administrator accounts with access to the backup/restore functionality
-
Examine backup archive handlingIf backup archives exist, inspect the extraction process for path traversal protections. This typically requires code review or testing with a crafted archive containing ../ sequences.Affected if The system does not validate or sanitize paths within backup archives before extraction, allowing ../ sequences to traverse outside the intended directory
The environment is affected if PowerCMS version falls within 4.0-4.60, 5.0-5.30, or 6.0-6.70 AND the backup/restore feature is enabled with administrator access available.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.615.316.71
Implement strict path validation and sanitization for all files within backup archives before extraction; use allowlist-based validation to ensure extracted paths remain within intended directories; restrict backup/restore functionality to minimum necessary administrators.
PowerCMS 4.61 (for 4.x branch), 5.31 (for 5.x branch), or 6.71 (for 6.x branch) - upgrade to the latest stable release in your current branch
- 1. Identify your current PowerCMS version by checking the administration interface or version file
- 2. Determine which version branch you are on (4.x, 5.x, or 6.x)
- 3. Download the appropriate fixed version from the official PowerCMS distribution (www.powercms.jp) - for 4.x use 4.61+, for 5.x use 5.31+, for 6.x use 6.71+
- 4. Create a complete backup of the current PowerCMS installation including database and files
- 5. Review the official upgrade documentation from PowerCMS before proceeding
- 6. Apply the upgrade following the standard upgrade procedure for your version branch
- 7. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version in the admin interface
- 8. Test the backup and restore functionality to confirm the vulnerability is resolved
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-46359 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-46359 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data