CVE-2025-54757
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple versions of PowerCMS allow unrestricted upload of dangerous files. If a product administrator accesses a malicious file uploaded by a product user, an arbitrary script may be executed on the browser.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidencePowerCMS multiple versions allow unrestricted upload of dangerous files. When a product administrator accesses a malicious file uploaded by a user, arbitrary scripts can execute in the administrator's browser - indicating a stored XSS vulnerability via file upload.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 4.0, < 4.61>= 5.0, < 5.31>= 6.0, < 6.71CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify PowerCMS versionLocate the version file or admin dashboard 'System Information' page in your PowerCMS installation. Common paths include /mt-static/index.html, a config file, or the admin interface system settings.Affected if The installed version falls within 4.0 to 4.60, 5.0 to 5.30, or 6.0 to 6.70 (the vulnerable version ranges).
-
Verify file upload feature is enabledCheck your PowerCMS admin panel under 'System Settings' or 'Website Settings' for the file upload or asset upload functionality. Look for configuration options related to uploading files, images, or attachments.Affected if File upload is enabled and users can submit files to the system.
-
Check uploaded file storage locationExamine the file upload configuration or inspect the directory where uploaded files are stored (commonly /mt-static/uploads/, /cgi-bin/, or a configurable asset path). Determine if this directory is within the web server's document root.Affected if Uploaded files are stored in a web-accessible directory (webroot or subdirectory) where they can be directly accessed via URL.
-
Inspect file type validation mechanismReview the server-side file upload handling code or admin configuration for allowlist-based file type validation. Check if there's any server-side validation that restricts file types before processing.Affected if There is no server-side allowlist validation, or the validation can be bypassed (for example, if it relies solely on client-side checks or file extension renaming).
Your environment is affected if you are running a vulnerable PowerCMS version (4.x before 4.61, 5.x before 5.31, or 6.x before 6.71) with the file upload feature enabled and uploaded files are stored in a web-accessible location without strict server-side allowlist validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.615.316.71
Implement strict allowlist-based file type validation server-side, sanitize filenames, store files outside webroot or with non-executable headers, and restrict admin access to uploaded content.
Upgrade to PowerCMS 4.61 (for v4.x), 5.31 (for v5.x), or 6.71 (for v6.x)
- 1. Back up your current PowerCMS database and all files
- 2. Download PowerCMS version 4.61 (if currently on major version 4), version 5.31 (if on major version 5), or version 6.71 (if on major version 6) from the official vendor site (www.powercms.jp)
- 3. Review the vendor's upgrade instructions specific to your version
- 4. Test the upgrade in a staging environment before deploying to production
- 5. Deploy the upgrade to production environment
- 6. Verify the installation and test file upload functionality
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-54757 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-54757 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data