CVE-2025-46647
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability of plugin openid-connect in Apache APISIX. This vulnerability will only have an impact if all of the following conditions are met: 1. Use the openid-connect plugin with introspection mode 2. The auth service connected to openid-connect provides services to multiple issuers 3. Multiple issuers share the same private key and relies only on the issuer being different If affected by this vulnerability, it would allow an attacker with a valid account on one of the issuers to log into the other issuer. This issue affects Apache APISIX: until 3.12.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.12.0 or higher.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe openid-connect plugin in Apache APISIX fails to properly validate issuer identity during token introspection when multiple issuers share the same private key. An attacker with a valid token from one issuer can authenticate as themselves on a different issuer that shares the same key, because the plugin relies solely on the issuer claim rather than validating key-issuer binding.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.12.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Apache APISIX versionRun 'apisix version' or check the version in your deployment manifests/packagingAffected if Version is below 3.12.0
-
Verify openid-connect plugin is enabledList enabled plugins via APISIX admin API at /apisix/admin/plugins or inspect your plugin configuration filesAffected if The openid-connect plugin is present and configured for route or global proxy
-
Identify configured issuers in openid-connect pluginExamine the plugin configuration (typically in route.yaml, upstreams.yaml, or apisix.yaml) for 'issuer', 'public_key', 'token_signing_alg', or related OIDC fields. Query the /apisix/admin/plugins/list endpoint if availableAffected if Multiple 'issuer' entries or multiple endpoints pointing to different issuers share the same 'public_key' or 'jwt_secret' value
-
Inspect key sharing across issuersCompare the public_key, jwt_secret, or token_signing_alg_values configuration across all configured issuers in your openid-connect setupAffected if Different issuers are configured with identical public_key or jwt_secret values without additional key-issuer binding validation
-
Confirm token introspection validation logicReview the openid-connect plugin's 'introspection' and 'authorization_endpoint' settings in your configuration. Check if 'ssl_verify' is enabled and if 'issuer' is the sole identifier without key binding verificationAffected if Plugin relies only on 'issuer' claim match without validating that the token's signing key belongs to that specific issuer
You are affected if running APISIX below 3.12.0 with the openid-connect plugin configured and multiple issuers share the same signing key without key-issuer binding validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.12.0
Upgrade Apache APISIX to version 3.12.0 or higher, or ensure different issuers use distinct private keys rather than relying solely on issuer identification.
3.12.0
- 1. Backup your current Apache APISIX configuration and data directory
- 2. Check your current Apache APISIX version using `apisix version` or checking your deployment manifests
- 3. For package-based installations: update your package repository and run `apt-get update && apt-get install apisix` or `yum update apisix` depending on your OS
- 4. For Docker-based installations: update your image tag to `apisix:3.12.0` or higher in your Docker Compose/Kubernetes manifests and recreate containers
- 5. For source-based installations: clone the Apache APISIX repository, checkout tag `3.12.0`, and rebuild using `./apisix release`
- 6. After upgrade, verify the openid-connect plugin configuration: ensure introspection mode is properly configured with issuer validation
- 7. Test authentication flow to confirm the vulnerability is remediated
- 8. Monitor logs for any errors post-upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-46647 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-46647 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data