CVE-2025-47890
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn URL Redirection to Untrusted Site vulnerabilities [CWE-601] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiOS 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiOS 7.2 all versions, FortiOS 7.0 all versions, FortiOS 6.4 all versions, FortiProxy 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiProxy 7.4 all versions, FortiProxy 7.2 all versions, FortiProxy 7.0 all versions, FortiSASE 25.2.a may allow an unauthenticated attacker to perform an open redirect attack via crafted HTTP requests.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn unauthenticated open redirect vulnerability (CWE-601) in FortiOS, FortiProxy, and FortiSASE allows attackers to craft malicious HTTP requests that redirect users to arbitrary external sites. The vulnerability affects multiple version ranges across the product lines.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.4.0, < 7.4.9>= 7.6.0, < 7.6.4>= 7.0.0, < 7.6.4= 25.3.40CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Fortinet product typeAccess the device CLI and run 'get system status' or check the web UI login page footer to confirm whether the device runs FortiOS, FortiProxy, or FortiSASEAffected if The device is not one of these three products, then this CVE does not apply
-
Retrieve the installed FortiOS versionIn CLI, run 'get system status' and note the 'FortiOS' version number shown in the outputAffected if The version falls within >= 6.4.0 and < 7.4.9, OR within >= 7.6.0 and < 7.6.4, then the system is affected
-
Retrieve the installed FortiProxy versionIn CLI, run 'get system status' and note the 'FortiProxy' version number shown in the outputAffected if The version falls within >= 7.0.0 and < 7.6.4, then the system is affected
-
Retrieve the installed FortiSASE versionIn CLI, run 'get system status' or check the SASE admin portal to identify the exact version numberAffected if The version is exactly 25.3.40, then the system is affected
-
Verify web interface exposureDetermine if the Fortinet web UI or SSL-VPN portal is accessible from untrusted networks by reviewing firewall policies and interface configurationsAffected if The web interface is externally accessible without authentication, the open redirect can be exploited by remote attackers
You are affected if your device runs FortiOS in version 6.4.0 through 7.4.8 or 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiProxy 7.0.0 through 7.6.3, or FortiSASE exactly version 25.3.40, and the web interface is network-accessible to untrusted users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.4.97.6.4
Apply the vendor-supplied patch or upgrade to a FortiOS/FortiProxy version beyond the affected ranges. For FortiSASE, update to the patched release per Fortinet's advisory.
FortiOS 7.4.9 or later; FortiOS 7.6.4 or later; FortiProxy 7.6.4 or later; FortiSASE 25.3.41 or later
- Identify the current FortiOS, FortiProxy, or FortiSASE version running on the device using 'get system status' or the web UI
- Download the appropriate firmware upgrade from Fortinet's support portal (fortinet.com/support)
- Upload the firmware image to the Fortinet device via web UI (System > Firmware) or CLI: 'execute firmware upgrade <image_name>','Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the new version with 'get system status'
- For FortiSASE, upgrade to version 25.3.41 or later as indicated in FortiSASE release notes
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-47890 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-47890 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data