CVE-2025-48802
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper certificate validation in Windows SMB allows an authorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · low confidenceThis is a certificate validation vulnerability in Windows SMB (Server Message Block) protocol. An authorized attacker can exploit improper certificate validation to perform spoofing attacks over the network, potentially allowing man-in-the-middle attacks or impersonation of legitimate SMB servers.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.22621.5624< 10.0.22631.5624< 10.0.20348.3932< 10.0.25398.1732CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Windows build versionOpen Command Prompt or PowerShell and run 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /C:"Build"' to obtain the OS build numberAffected if The build number is below 10.0.22621.5624 for Windows 11 22h2, below 10.0.22631.5624 for Windows 11 23h2, below 10.0.20348.3932 for Windows Server 2022, or below 10.0.25398.1732 for Windows Server 2022 23h2
-
Confirm SMB is enabledRun 'Get-SmbServerConfiguration' in PowerShell and check the 'EnableSMB1Protocol' or 'EnableSMB2Protocol' status, or run 'sc query mrxsmb10' to check if the SMB service is runningAffected if SMB protocol is enabled and the Windows build version is in the affected range
-
Check SMB signing configurationRun 'Get-SmbServerConfiguration | Select-Object RequireSecuritySignature' in PowerShell to check if SMB signing is required on the server, or run 'Get-SmbConnection' to see active SMB connectionsAffected if SMB is configured without requiring signed connections and the Windows build version is in the affected range
-
Inspect SMB certificate authentication settingsCheck if SMB over TLS or SMB signing with certificates is configured by examining 'Get-SmbServerConfiguration' output for 'EncryptData' or by reviewing SMB share certificates via 'Get-SmbShare' with 'EncryptData' propertyAffected if SMB uses certificate-based authentication or encryption and the Windows build version is in the affected range
A system is affected if it runs any of the specified Windows versions below the fixed build numbers AND has SMB protocol enabled, particularly when SMB signing or certificate authentication is in use.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.20348.393210.0.22621.562410.0.22631.5624
Apply Microsoft security updates for Windows when available. Ensure SMB connections use properly validated certificates and consider network segmentation to limit exposure to authorized attackers.
Windows 11 22h2 to build 10.0.22621.5624 or later | Windows 11 23h2 to build 10.0.22631.5624 or later | Windows Server 2022 to build 10.0.20348.3932 or later | Windows Server 2022 23h2 to build 10.0.25398.1732 or later
- Open Windows Settings on the affected system
- Navigate to Windows Update (Settings > Windows Update)
- Click 'Check for updates' to retrieve available updates
- Install all recommended updates, specifically looking for the security update containing build 10.0.22621.5624 (Windows 11 22h2), 10.0.22631.5624 (Windows 11 23h2), 10.0.20348.3932 (Windows Server 2022), or 10.0.25398.1732 (Windows Server 2022 23h2)
- Restart the system when prompted to complete the update installation
- Verify the installed version by running 'winver' or checking System Properties to confirm the build number matches or exceeds the fixed version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-48802 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-48802 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data