CVE-2025-49001
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDataEase is an open source business intelligence and data visualization tool. Prior to version 2.10.10, secret verification does not take effect successfully, so a user can use any secret to forge a JWT token. The vulnerability has been fixed in v2.10.10. No known workarounds are available.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceDataEase versions prior to 2.10.10 have a JWT authentication bypass where secret verification fails to validate properly, allowing attackers to forge JWT tokens using any secret value and gain unauthorized access to the system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.10.10CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify DataEase installationLocate the DataEase application directory or check running services. Common locations: /opt/dataease, /usr/local/dataease, or check systemctl status dataeaseAffected if DataEase is not installed - no further action needed
-
Check DataEase versionRun 'dataease -v' or check the version file in the installation directory, typically found in VERSION or version.txt within the DataEase root folderAffected if Version is 2.10.10 or lower - system may be vulnerable
-
Verify JWT authentication is enabledInspect DataEase configuration files (application.yml, application.properties, or config.yaml) for jwt.enabled setting or JWT-related configuration sectionsAffected if JWT authentication is enabled - vulnerable to token forgery
-
Inspect JWT secret configurationCheck the configuration files for jwt.secret or security.jwt.secret properties to see how the JWT signing secret is configuredAffected if A static or weak JWT secret is in use - combined with vulnerable version enables the bypass
If DataEase version is 2.10.10 or earlier and JWT authentication is enabled, the environment is affected by this JWT authentication bypass vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade DataEase to version 2.10.10 or later to remediate this JWT token forgery vulnerability. No workarounds are available.
Dataease v2.10.10
- Upgrade Dataease to version 2.10.10 or later to address the JWT secret verification bypass vulnerability
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,504.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-49001 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-49001 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data