CVE-2025-52987
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA clickjacking vulnerability exists in the web portal of Juniper Networks Paragon Automation (Pathfinder, Planner, Insights) due to the application's failure to set appropriate X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type HTTP headers. This vulnerability allows an attacker to trick users into interacting with the interface under the attacker's control. This issue affects all versions of Paragon Automation (Pathfinder, Planner, Insights) before 24.1.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a clickjacking vulnerability in Juniper Paragon Automation where the web portal fails to set X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options HTTP headers, allowing the application to be embedded in iframes on attacker-controlled pages. Attackers can overlay invisible or disguised interface elements to trick authenticated users into performing unintended actions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 24.1.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Juniper Paragon Automation deploymentIdentify whether Juniper Paragon Automation is installed in your environment and locate its web portal URL (typically accessible on port 443 or 8443). Check with your system administrator or review network service listings.Affected if Juniper Paragon Automation web portal is accessible and running in your environment
-
Check installed versionDetermine the installed version of Juniper Paragon Automation by accessing the web UI admin panel, checking /opt/juniper/version files, or using CLI commands such as 'pkg show' or 'version' if you have shell access. Compare against the affected range: versions prior to 24.1.1 are vulnerable.Affected if Installed version is lower than 24.1.1 (e.g., 24.1.0, 23.x, or earlier releases)
-
Inspect HTTP responses for X-Frame-Options headerSend an HTTP GET request to the Paragon Automation web portal URL using a tool like curl: curl -I https://your-paragon-host.com. Examine the response headers for the presence of X-Frame-Options.Affected if X-Frame-Options header is absent from HTTP responses, allowing the site to be embedded in iframes
-
Inspect HTTP responses for X-Content-Type-Options headerSend an HTTP GET request to the Paragon Automation web portal URL and examine response headers for X-Content-Type-Options. Example: curl -I https://your-paragon-host.com.Affected if X-Content-Type-Options header is absent from HTTP responses, allowing MIME type sniffing attacks
You are affected if Juniper Paragon Automation version is below 24.1.1 AND the web portal HTTP responses are missing either X-Frame-Options or X-Content-Type-Options headers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped24.1.1
Configure the web server or application to include X-Frame-Options: DENY or SAMEORIGIN and X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff headers in all HTTP responses, or upgrade to version 24.1.1 or later.
24.1.1
- 1. Identify the current version of Paragon Automation by accessing the web interface or using the CLI command: show version
- 2. Verify the installation is affected by checking the X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options headers using browser developer tools or curl: curl -I https://<paragon-host>
- 3. If headers are missing or set to 'DENY' or 'SAMEORIGIN' is absent, the system is vulnerable
- 4. Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade
- 5. Create a backup of the current Paragon Automation configuration
- 6. Download Paragon Automation version 24.1.1 or later from the Juniper support portal (supportportal.juniper.net)
- 7. Perform the upgrade following the official Juniper upgrade documentation for Paragon Automation
- 8. After upgrade, verify the fix by checking that X-Frame-Options: DENY or X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN is present in HTTP responses
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,304.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-52987 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-52987 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data