CVE-2025-53077
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn execution after redirect in Samsung DMS(Data Management Server) allows attackers to execute limited functions without permissions. An attacker could compromise the integrity of the platform by executing this vulnerability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAn execution after redirect vulnerability in Samsung DMS (Data Management Server) allows unauthenticated or unauthorized attackers to execute limited functions by bypassing redirect-based access controls. The vulnerability occurs when the application continues processing after issuing a redirect response, enabling attackers to perform actions without proper authorization.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.0.0, < 2.3.13.1>= 2.5.0.17, < 2.6.14.1>= 2.7.0.15, < 2.9.3.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Samsung DMS firmware versionAccess the DMS administrative interface or check the system information page. On the server console, run: 'dm-cli get-version' or check the firmware version file typically located in /opt/dms/version or similar system directories. Consult your DMS documentation for the exact command for your version.Affected if The installed version falls within: >= 2.0.0 and < 2.3.13.1; OR >= 2.5.0.17 and < 2.6.14.1; OR >= 2.7.0.15 and < 2.9.3.6.
-
Identify redirect-based access control usageReview the DMS web application configuration files (typically in config/ or WEB-INF/ directories if web-based). Look for security filters or interceptors that handle authentication/authorization via HTTP redirect responses.Affected if The application uses redirect responses (HTTP 302/301) to enforce access controls, and the server continues processing after sending the redirect.
-
Review server logs for suspicious redirect behaviorExamine DMS server logs (typically in /var/log/dms/ or similar) for entries showing successful requests immediately following redirect responses. Search for patterns where request processing continued after redirect status codes.Affected if Logs show requests completing successfully with HTTP 302/301 status codes followed by expected post-redirect processing, indicating the vulnerability may be present.
You are affected if your Samsung Data Management Server firmware version is within the listed vulnerable ranges and the application uses redirect-based access control mechanisms.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.3.13.12.6.14.12.9.3.6
Apply the vendor security patch for CVE-2025-53077 and implement proper authorization validation immediately after redirect operations to prevent unauthorized function execution.
2.9.3.6 (or latest available in your branch)
- 1. Identify the current Data Management Server Firmware version installed.
- 2. Determine which version range the current firmware falls into (2.0.0-2.3.13.1, 2.5.0.17-2.6.14.1, or 2.7.0.15-2.9.3.6).
- 3. Access the Samsung firmware download portal at security.samsungda.com or official Samsung support channels.
- 4. Download the appropriate fixed firmware version: upgrade to 2.3.13.1 or later for the 2.0.x-2.3.x branch, 2.6.14.1 or later for the 2.5.x-2.6.x branch, or 2.9.3.6 or later for the 2.7.x-2.9.x branch.
- 5. Review Samsung's firmware upgrade documentation for proper installation procedures.
- 6. Apply the firmware upgrade following vendor-specified methods (typically via admin console or OTA update).
- 7. After upgrade, verify the new firmware version is installed and test that the EAR vulnerability is resolved.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-53077 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-53077 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data