Data Management Server FirmwareOperating system · Samsung

CVE-2025-53081

CRITICAL · 9.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-07-29
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 2.3.13.1 / 2.6.14.1 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An 'Arbitrary File Creation' in Samsung DMS(Data Management Server) allows attackers to create arbitrary files in unintended locations on the filesystem. Exploitation is restricted to specific, authorized private IP addresses.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Arbitrary file creation vulnerability in Samsung DMS (Data Management Server) allows authenticated attackers from specific private IP addresses to write files to unintended filesystem locations, likely due to insufficient path validation or directory traversal prevention in the file upload/creation functionality.

MitigationRestrict DMS access to minimum necessary IP ranges, implement strict path traversal validation and allowlist-based file creation controls, and apply vendor-provided patches immediately given the critical 9.1 severity.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Data Management Server FirmwareOperating system
Affected:>= 2.0.0, < 2.3.13.1>= 2.5.0.17, < 2.6.14.1>= 2.7.0.15, < 2.9.3.6

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Samsung DMS installation and version
    Access the DMS web interface or check the firmware/version information through the admin console, or run 'dmversion' or check '/version' endpoint if CLI access is available
    Affected if The installed version falls within >= 2.0.0 to < 2.3.13.1, OR >= 2.5.0.17 to < 2.6.14.1, OR >= 2.7.0.15 to < 2.9.3.6
  2. Confirm file upload or file creation feature is accessible
    Log into the DMS admin panel and navigate to the file upload, file import, or data import functionality. Check if these endpoints are enabled and accessible to authenticated users
    Affected if The file upload/creation module is enabled and accessible to authenticated users, as the vulnerability requires using this feature
  3. Verify network accessibility from private IP ranges
    Review DMS network configuration and firewall rules to determine if the server accepts connections from private IP addresses (RFC 1918 ranges: 10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, 192.168.0.0/16). Check access control lists or IP whitelisting settings in DMS
    Affected if The DMS server is reachable from private IP addresses and allows authentication from these ranges, as the vulnerability is exploitable only from specific private IP addresses
  4. Inspect for directory traversal protection in file operations
    If you have access to DMS configuration or logs, check the file upload handling code or configuration for path validation. Look for settings related to path traversal prevention or upload directory restrictions
    Affected if No directory traversal protection or allowlist-based path validation is configured for the file creation functionality
  5. Check authentication and authorization configuration
    Review user authentication settings and role-based access controls in the DMS admin console to confirm that authenticated users can access file creation features
    Affected if Authenticated users beyond administrators have access to file upload/creation capabilities, as the vulnerability requires authentication

You are affected if Samsung DMS is running a firmware version within the affected ranges AND the file upload/creation feature is enabled AND the server is accessible from private IP addresses.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 2.3.13.1 / 2.6.14.1 / 2.9.3.6 or later
Fixed in 2.3.13.12.6.14.12.9.3.6
Interim mitigation

Restrict DMS access to minimum necessary IP ranges, implement strict path traversal validation and allowlist-based file creation controls, and apply vendor-provided patches immediately given the critical 9.1 severity.

Recommended fix High confidence

Upgrade to firmware version 2.3.13.1 or higher (for 2.x versions), 2.6.14.1 or higher (for 2.5.x-2.6.x versions), or 2.9.3.6 or higher (for 2.7.x-2.9.x versions). Recommended: 2.9.3.6 or latest stable release.

  1. 1. Identify the currently installed Data Management Server Firmware version by accessing the server administration interface or checking system documentation.
  2. 2. Determine which version range your current firmware falls into: 2.0.0-2.3.13.0, 2.5.0.17-2.6.14.0, or 2.7.0.15-2.9.3.5.
  3. 3. Obtain the firmware update from the official Samsung source at security.samsungda.com or through your designated Samsung support channel.
  4. 4. Apply the firmware upgrade to the Data Management Server, following Samsung's standard firmware update procedure for your specific deployment.
  5. 5. After upgrade, verify the new firmware version is installed and confirm the arbitrary file creation vulnerability is resolved.
Caveat Review Samsung's release notes for the target version to check for any changes in functionality, API behavior, or configuration requirements that may affect your deployment.

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Data Management Server Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-53081 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-53081 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data