CVE-2025-53192
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · unedited** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** Improper Neutralization of Expression/Command Delimiters vulnerability in Apache Commons OGNL. This issue affects Apache Commons OGNL: all versions. When using the API Ognl.getValue, the OGNL engine parses and evaluates the provided expression with powerful capabilities, including accessing and invoking related methods, etc. Although OgnlRuntime attempts to restrict certain dangerous classes and methods (such as java.lang.Runtime) through a blocklist, these restrictions are not comprehensive. Attackers may be able to bypass the restrictions by leveraging class objects that are not covered by the blocklist and potentially achieve arbitrary code execution. As this project is retired, we do not plan to release a version that fixes this issue. Users are recommended to find an alternative or restrict access to the instance to trusted users. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceApache Commons OGNL's Ognl.getValue API evaluates expressions with powerful capabilities but uses an incomplete blocklist to restrict dangerous classes like java.lang.Runtime. Attackers can bypass these restrictions by leveraging unblocked class objects to achieve arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Apache Commons OGNL dependencySearch your project dependencies (Maven pom.xml, Gradle build.gradle, or JAR files in classpath) for 'commons-ognl' or 'org.apache.commons.ognl'Affected if The dependency is present in the project
-
Locate Ognl.getValue usageSearch your codebase for calls to Ognl.getValue, OgnlParser.getValue, or similar OGNL evaluation methodsAffected if Code calls Ognl.getValue or related APIs
-
Determine input source to OGNL evaluationTrace the data flow into Ognl.getValue calls - check if parameters come from HTTP requests, user input, configuration files, or other external sourcesAffected if Untrusted or user-controlled input can reach Ognl.getValue
-
Check if OGNL evaluation is exposed to untrusted usersReview authentication and authorization controls around code paths that invoke OGNL evaluationAffected if The OGNL evaluation endpoint or functionality is accessible to untrusted or unauthenticated users
If Apache Commons OGNL is present in the environment and untrusted input can flow to Ognl.getValue, the application is vulnerable to command injection.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedSince Apache Commons OGNL is retired with no fix coming, immediately identify all OGNL usage, migrate to a supported expression library (e.g., MVEL, SpEL), or implement strict input validation/sandboxing and restrict access to trusted users only.
- Accept that Apache Commons OGNL is retired and no vendor fix will be released
- Identify all code dependencies on Commons Ognl across the codebase
- Evaluate and migrate to an actively maintained OGNL library alternative such as Apache Commons OGNL's successor projects, or replace OGNL expression evaluation with a safer alternative
- If migration is not immediately feasible, implement strict access controls: restrict who can submit OGNL expressions to the system, apply network-level filtering, and add application-layer validation/authorization before any Ognl.getValue() call
- Audit logging and monitoring should be enabled for any OGNL expression evaluation to detect exploitation attempts
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation16.0 h
- Implementation32.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA16.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $22,784.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-53192 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-53192 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data