CVE-2025-5326
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was found in zhilink 智互联(深圳)科技有限公司 ADP Application Developer Platform 应用开发者平台 1.0.0 and classified as critical. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /adpweb/wechat/verifyToken/. The manipulation leads to deserialization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA deserialization vulnerability exists in the /adpweb/wechat/verifyToken/ endpoint of Zhilink ADP Application Developer Platform version 1.0.0. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to manipulate deserialization operations, likely through crafted payloads in the verifyToken functionality. A public exploit is available, enabling unauthenticated remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Zhilink ADP Application Developer Platform installationLocate the application's web root directory or check running services for 'adpweb' or 'Zhilink' components. Look for files or services referencing 'ADP' or 'Application Developer Platform'.Affected if The software is present on the system and is the Zhilink ADP Application Developer Platform
-
Verify the installed version is 1.0.0Check version files, banner grabbing from the web service, or consult the application's about/info page for the exact version number. Compare against the affected version range.Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.0.0
-
Confirm the vulnerable endpoint existsCheck if the path /adpweb/wechat/verifyToken/ is accessible by attempting to access it via HTTP/HTTPS or reviewing web server configuration files for route definitions.Affected if The /adpweb/wechat/verifyToken/ endpoint is present and reachable
-
Verify the verifyToken functionality is enabledReview application configuration files or module settings to determine if the WeChat verification token feature is actively enabled, rather than disabled or commented out.Affected if The verifyToken functionality is enabled in the application configuration
You are affected if Zhilink ADP Application Developer Platform version 1.0.0 is installed with the /adpweb/wechat/verifyToken/ endpoint accessible and the verifyToken feature enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataSince the vendor did not respond, implement compensating controls: restrict network access to the affected endpoint, deploy WAF rules to block known deserialization attack patterns, and investigate alternative solutions or vendor support. If possible, disable the vulnerable endpoint until a patch is available.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-5326 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-5326 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data