CVE-2025-6267
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was found in zhilink 智互联(深圳)科技有限公司 ADP Application Developer Platform 应用开发者平台 1.0.0. It has been rated as critical. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /adpweb/a/base/barcodeDetail/. The manipulation of the argument barcodeNo/barcode/itemNo leads to sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA SQL injection vulnerability exists in zhilink ADP Application Developer Platform 1.0.0 in the /adpweb/a/base/barcodeDetail/ endpoint. The barcodeNo, barcode, or itemNo parameters are not properly sanitized before being used in database queries, allowing remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed product and versionLocate the zhilink ADP Application Developer Platform installation and determine its version number. Check application metadata, about pages, or installation directories for version 1.0.0.Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.0.0 of Zhilink ADP Application Developer Platform
-
Verify barcodeDetail endpoint is accessibleConfirm the web application is running and the /adpweb/a/base/barcodeDetail/ endpoint is reachable. Use a browser or HTTP client to request this path.Affected if The endpoint responds with HTTP 200 or other application responses, indicating the route exists and is active
-
Identify if barcodeNo, barcode, or itemNo parameters are processedReview HTTP requests to the barcodeDetail endpoint. Check if any of these three parameters (barcodeNo, barcode, itemNo) are accepted as query string or POST body parameters.Affected if The application accepts and processes any of these three parameters without immediate rejection or sanitization feedback
-
Inspect application logs for SQL error evidenceReview application and database logs for SQL syntax errors, database error messages, or unusual query patterns when the affected parameters are used. Patterns like SQLSTATE, syntax error, or unterminated quotes indicate the vulnerability.Affected if Database errors appear in logs when malformed input is provided to the barcodeNo, barcode, or itemNo parameters, confirming unsanitized input reaches the database layer
A user is affected if they are running Zhilink ADP Application Developer Platform version 1.0.0 with the /adpweb/a/base/barcodeDetail/ endpoint accessible and accepting barcodeNo, barcode, or itemNo parameters without proper input sanitization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement parameterized queries or prepared statements for all database operations involving user-supplied input. Apply input validation and employ least-privilege database accounts to limit the impact of any successful injection.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-6267 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-6267 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data