CVE-2025-54136
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCursor is a code editor built for programming with AI. In versions 1.2.4 and below, attackers can achieve remote and persistent code execution by modifying an already trusted MCP configuration file inside a shared GitHub repository or editing the file locally on the target's machine. Once a collaborator accepts a harmless MCP, the attacker can silently swap it for a malicious command (e.g., calc.exe) without triggering any warning or re-prompt. If an attacker has write permissions on a user's active branches of a source repository that contains existing MCP servers the user has previously approved, or allows an attacker has arbitrary file-write locally, the attacker can achieve arbitrary code execution. This is fixed in version 1.3.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn Cursor 1.2.4 and below, the MCP (Model Context Protocol) configuration system fails to re-prompt or warn users when a previously trusted MCP configuration file is modified. An attacker with write access to a shared GitHub repository's active branches (containing existing approved MCP servers) or local file system access can silently swap benign MCP commands for malicious ones (e.g., calc.exe), achieving arbitrary code execution on the victim's machine without any user interaction.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Cursor versionRun 'cursor --version' from command line or open Cursor and go to Help > About to view the version numberAffected if Version is below 1.3 (e.g., 1.2.4, 1.2.3, etc.)
-
Locate MCP configuration filesLook for .mcp.json, mcp.config, or similar MCP configuration files in your user configuration directory, project directories, or shared repository roots where Cursor is usedAffected if MCP configuration files exist in your environment
-
Inspect MCP server commandsOpen each MCP configuration file and examine the 'command', 'args', or 'server' entries for paths to local executables (e.g., .exe, .sh, .bat files) or external scriptsAffected if MCP configurations reference local executables or scripts that could be replaced
-
Verify file integrity of MCP configsCheck the last modification timestamp of each MCP configuration file using file system properties or 'ls -la' / 'dir' commands. Compare against expected modification dates or check version control history if availableAffected if MCP config files have unexpected modification dates or show modifications you did not author
-
Audit shared repository MCP configsIf using shared repositories, review all MCP configuration files in those repositories for any unexpected changes in command paths or server definitions between commitsAffected if Shared repository MCP configs contain command paths that differ from the expected baseline
You are affected if Cursor version is below 1.3 and you have MCP configuration files with external command references that could be silently modified by an attacker.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.3
Update Cursor to version 1.3 or later. Review and audit all MCP configuration files in shared repositories and local machines for any unauthorized modifications.
Cursor 1.3
- Verify current Cursor version by checking Help > About or running cursor --version
- Download Cursor version 1.3 or later from the official cursor.sh website
- Install the update - on Windows this typically runs the installer which will upgrade the existing installation
- After upgrading, verify the new version is installed: Help > About should show version 1.3 or higher
- Review existing MCP configuration files in your projects to ensure no malicious modifications were made before the upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-54136 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-54136 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data