CVE-2025-54329
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in NAS in Samsung Mobile Processor, Wearable Processor, and Modem Exynos 980, 990, 850, 2100, 1280, 2200, 1330, 1380, 1480, 2400, 1580, 2500, W920, W930, W1000, Modem 5123, Modem 5300, and Modem 5400. The function used to send a multiple-payloads message (including an SMS message) lacks bounds checking, which can lead to a heap overflow.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA heap overflow vulnerability exists in the NAS (Non-Access Stratum) layer of Samsung's Exynos mobile processors, wearable processors, and modems. The function responsible for processing multiple-payload messages (including SMS) lacks proper bounds checking, allowing an attacker to overflow the heap buffer by sending specially crafted messages. This could enable remote code execution or denial of service on affected devices.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device processor modelCheck the device specifications or system information to determine if the device uses a Samsung Exynos processor (1280, 1330, 1380, 1480, 1580, 2100, 2200, or 2400). On Android, this is typically found under Settings > About Phone > SoC Name or via commands like 'cat /proc/cpuinfo'.Affected if The processor is any of the listed Exynos variants (1280, 1330, 1380, 1480, 1580, 2100, 2200, 2400).
-
Check the baseband/modem firmware versionRetrieve the modem or baseband firmware version. On Android, use 'AT+CGMR' via a terminal app with modem diagnostics, or check under Settings > About Phone > Modem Software Version. Compare this version against Samsung's published firmware releases.Affected if The baseband firmware version corresponds to an affected Exynos variant listed in the CVE. All firmware versions for these processors are affected.
-
Verify SMS service is enabledCheck if the device has SMS and multimedia messaging capability active. This is typically always enabled on mobile phones but can be verified through the Phone app settings or by checking if the device can send/receive text messages.Affected if SMS or multimedia messaging services are enabled on the device (this is the default state for most mobile devices).
-
Inspect for signs of heap corruption or exploitationCheck system logs (logcat on Android) for any unusual modem crashes, heap-related errors, or unexpected SMS processing failures. Look for patterns such as 'heap buffer overflow', 'NAS layer error', or modem restart loops.Affected if Unexpected modem crashes, heap corruption errors, or denial of service symptoms appear in logs, particularly after receiving SMS or multimedia messages from unknown sources.
The device is affected if it uses any of the listed Exynos processors (1280, 1330, 1380, 1480, 1580, 2100, 2200, 2400) with SMS or multimedia messaging enabled, as all firmware versions for these processors contain the vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-supplied firmware updates from Samsung for affected processors/modems. Until patches are available, consider network-level filtering of malformed SMS/multimedia messages as a compensating control.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,592.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-54329 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-54329 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data