CVE-2025-54451
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in Samsung Electronics MagicINFO 9 Server allows Code Injection.This issue affects MagicINFO 9 Server: less than 21.1080.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSamsung MagicINFO 9 Server versions prior to 21.1080.0 contain a code injection vulnerability allowing remote attackers to inject malicious code due to improper control of code generation. The critical CVSS score of 9.8 indicates the potential for complete system compromise with no authentication required.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 21.1080.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify MagicINFO 9 Server installationLocate the Samsung MagicINFO 9 Server installation directory or check running services on the host system to confirm the application is presentAffected if The server is installed and running
-
Identify the installed versionAccess the server administration interface or check version information in the installation directory, typically found in about/settings panels or version manifest filesAffected if The version cannot be determined or is not displayed
-
Compare against affected version rangeReview the installed version number against the affected range: versions prior to 21.1080.0Affected if Installed version is below 21.1080.0 (e.g., 21.1070, 21.1060, etc.)
-
Check web service accessibilityDetermine if the MagicINFO web interface is exposed to network access, as this vulnerability is exploitable without authenticationAffected if The web interface is accessible from network and version is below 21.1080.0
The environment is affected if Samsung MagicINFO 9 Server is installed with a version number lower than 21.1080.0 and the web interface is network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped21.1080.0
Upgrade MagicINFO 9 Server to version 21.1080.0 or later to remediate this code injection vulnerability.
21.1080.0 or later
- Identify the current version of MagicINFO 9 Server by accessing the server administration interface or checking system information
- Confirm the current version is below 21.1080.0
- Obtain the updated MagicINFO 9 Server version 21.1080.0 or later from Samsung's official channels or support
- Follow Samsung's documented upgrade procedure to apply version 21.1080.0 to the affected server
- After upgrading, verify the new version number reflects 21.1080.0 or higher
- Test critical functionality to ensure the upgrade completed successfully and the server operates normally
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-54451 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-54451 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data