CVE-2025-54453
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in Samsung Electronics MagicINFO 9 Server allows Code Injection.This issue affects MagicINFO 9 Server: less than 21.1080.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA path traversal vulnerability in Samsung MagicINFO 9 Server (versions prior to 21.1080.0) allows attackers to escape restricted directories and inject malicious code. The improper limitation of pathname to a restricted directory enables remote code execution with critical severity (CVSS 9.8), likely exploitable over network without authentication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 21.1080.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Samsung MagicINFO 9 Server installationCheck for MagicINFO 9 Server in installed programs (Windows: Add/Remove Programs, Linux: package manager), or look for the service process named 'MagicINFO' or 'MagicINFO Server' running on the system.Affected if Samsung MagicINFO 9 Server is installed and running on the system.
-
Identify installed MagicINFO versionLocate the MagicINFO installation directory and check for a version file, or use the MagicINFO admin interface to view version information. Common paths include C:\Program Files\Samsung\MagicINFO\ or /opt/magicinfo/. The version is typically displayed in the application or in a version.txt/readme file.Affected if The installed version is any version prior to 21.1080.0.
-
Verify file upload or content serving functionalityReview MagicINFO configuration files (typically in config/ or settings/ directories within the installation folder) to confirm if file upload, media import, or web content serving features are enabled.Affected if File upload, media import, or web content serving features are enabled in MagicINFO configuration.
-
Assess network accessibility of MagicINFO serviceCheck if MagicINFO server ports (commonly 7001, 8080, or443 for web interface) are exposed to network accessible IPs. Use netstat or firewall rules to identify listening ports and their binding addresses.Affected if MagicINFO web interface or API ports are listening on a network-accessible IP address (not localhost only).
The system is affected if Samsung MagicINFO 9 Server version is installed and the version is lower than 21.1080.0, with the web interface accessible over the network.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped21.1080.0
Upgrade MagicINFO 9 Server to version 21.1080.0 or later to remediate the path traversal vulnerability. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, implement strict file system access controls and network segmentation to limit exposure.
MagicINFO 9 Server version 21.1080.0 or later
- Identify the current MagicINFO 9 Server version by accessing the server administration interface or checking system information
- Access the Samsung security updates portal at https://security.samsungtv.com/securityUpdates to obtain the official patch for version 21.1080.0 or later
- Download the official Samsung MagicINFO 9 Server security patch
- Before applying the patch, perform a complete backup of the MagicINFO 9 Server database, configuration files, and any custom content
- Apply the security patch or upgrade to version 21.1080.0 following Samsung's official installation documentation
- After upgrade, verify the server version displays 21.1080.0 or higher
- Test critical functionality including file upload, content scheduling, and remote management to ensure proper operation
- Review system logs to confirm no path traversal errors or security exceptions remain
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing10.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,504.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-54453 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-54453 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data