CVE-2025-54539
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability exists in the Apache ActiveMQ NMS AMQP Client. This issue affects all versions of Apache ActiveMQ NMS AMQP up to and including 2.3.0, when establishing connections to untrusted AMQP servers. Malicious servers could exploit unbounded deserialization logic present in the client to craft responses that may lead to arbitrary code execution on the client side. Although version 2.1.0 introduced a mechanism to restrict deserialization via allow/deny lists, the protection was found to be bypassable under certain conditions. In line with Microsoft’s deprecation of binary serialization in .NET 9, the project is evaluating the removal of .NET binary serialization support from the NMS API entirely in future releases. Mitigation and Recommendations: Users are strongly encouraged to upgrade to version 2.4.0 or later, which resolves the issue. Additionally, projects depending on NMS-AMQP should migrate away from .NET binary serialization as part of a long-term hardening strategy.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Apache ActiveMQ NMS AMQP Client versions up to 2.3.0 contain a deserialization vulnerability where malicious AMQP servers can craft malicious responses that trigger unsafe deserialization, leading to arbitrary code execution on the client. Although version 2.1.0 introduced allow/deny list protections, these can be bypassed under certain conditions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.4.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify NMS AMQP Client versionInspect the project dependencies: check the .csproj file, packages.config, or the loaded assembly version for Apache.NMS.AMQP. If using a compiled binary, use a .NET disassembler or inspect the file properties to find the version metadata.Affected if The installed version is prior to 2.4.0 (e.g., 2.3.0, 2.2.0, 2.1.0, etc.)
-
Verify AMQP client usage in applicationsSearch project code for references to Apache.NMS.AMQP namespaces, ConnectionFactory usage, or AMQP connection creation patterns. Check deployed application binaries and dependencies for the presence of Apache.NMS.AMQP.dll.Affected if Any application uses the Apache NMS AMQP Client library to connect to AMQP brokers
-
Confirm allow/deny list configurationSearch application configuration files (app.config, web.config) and code for SerializationAllowList or SerializationDenyList settings, or any custom deserialization configuration related to NMS AMQP.Affected if Allow/deny list is not configured, or the configuration exists but was applied prior to version 2.1.0 when the feature was introduced
-
Assess broker trust modelReview the application's AMQP connection configuration to determine whether it connects to trusted or untrusted AMQP servers. Check connection strings or connection factory settings for remote broker addresses.Affected if The client connects to untrusted or externally accessible AMQP servers, or the broker is not under the organization's direct control
The environment is affected if the Apache NMS AMQP Client version is below 2.4.0 and the application uses this library to communicate with AMQP servers, particularly untrusted ones.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.4.0
Upgrade to NMS-AMQP version 2.4.0 or later to obtain the security fix, and migrate away from .NET binary serialization as a long-term hardening measure.
Version 2.4.0 or later
- Upgrade Apache ActiveMQ NMS AMQP Client to version 2.4.0 or later
- Verify the upgrade by testing AMQP client connections and functionality
- Review and update serialization configurations if previously using allow/deny list mitigations
- Plan migration away from .NET binary serialization as a long-term hardening measure
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,472.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-54539 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-54539 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data