CVE-2025-54831
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedApache Airflow 3 introduced a change to the handling of sensitive information in Connections. The intent was to restrict access to sensitive connection fields to Connection Editing Users, effectively applying a "write-only" model for sensitive values. In Airflow 3.0.3, this model was unintentionally violated: sensitive connection information could be viewed by users with READ permissions through both the API and the UI. This behavior also bypassed the `AIRFLOW__CORE__HIDE_SENSITIVE_VAR_CONN_FIELDS` configuration option. This issue does not affect Airflow 2.x, where exposing sensitive information to connection editors was the intended and documented behavior. Users of Airflow 3.0.3 are advised to upgrade Airflow to >=3.0.4.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn Apache Airflow 3.0.3, sensitive connection fields (passwords, tokens, secrets) are incorrectly exposed to users with only READ permissions through both the API and UI, violating the intended write-only model. This exposure bypasses the AIRFLOW__CORE__HIDE_SENSITIVE_VAR_CONN_FIELDS configuration option designed to mask sensitive values.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.0.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Airflow versionRun 'airflow version' or check the Airflow UI footer to confirm the exact version numberAffected if Version is exactly 3.0.3 (other versions are not affected by this specific CVE)
-
Create a test user with only READ permissionsCreate a user role or test account that has only read access to connections (e.g., Viewer or custom role without edit/delete permissions)Affected if The test user exists and has only read-level permissions on connections
-
Check API exposure of sensitive connection fieldsUsing the read-only test user credentials, query the Airflow API endpoint for connection details (e.g., GET /api/v1/connections/{connection_id}) and inspect the response payload for sensitive fields like password, login, or extraAffected if Sensitive fields (password, token, secret) are returned in plaintext in the API response for a read-only user, despite AIRFLOW__CORE__HIDE_SENSITIVE_VAR_CONN_FIELDS being enabled
-
Check UI exposure of sensitive connection fieldsLog in as the read-only test user through the Airflow web UI, navigate to Admin > Connections, and view the details of any connectionAffected if Sensitive fields are displayed in plaintext in the connection detail view for a read-only user
If running Airflow 3.0.3 and sensitive connection fields are visible to users with only read permissions via either the API or UI, the environment is affected by this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Airflow to version 3.0.4 or higher to restore proper access controls on sensitive connection fields.
Airflow >=3.0.4
- Upgrade Apache Airflow from version 3.0.3 to version 3.0.4 or later
- After upgrading, verify that sensitive connection fields are no longer visible to users with READ-only permissions
- Confirm the `AIRFLOW__CORE__HIDE_SENSITIVE_VAR_CONN_FIELDS` configuration option is now properly enforced
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-54831 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-54831 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data