Socet GxpApplication · Baesystems

CVE-2025-54964

HIGH · 8.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-10-23
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 4.6.0.2 or later.
See remediation →
89/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An issue was discovered in BAE SOCET GXP before 4.6.0.2. An attacker with the ability to interact with the GXP Job Service may inject arbitrary executables. If the Job Service is configured for local-only access, this may allow for privilege escalation in certain situations. If the Job Service is network accessible, this may allow remote command execution.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The GXP Job Service in BAE SOCET GXP versions prior to 4.6.0.2 lacks proper input validation, allowing an attacker who can interact with the service to inject and execute arbitrary executables. When the Job Service is network-accessible, this enables remote command execution; when local-only, it can be leveraged for privilege escalation.

MitigationUpgrade to BAE SOCET GXP version 4.6.0.2 or later to obtain the patch. Additionally, restrict the Job Service to local-only access if network accessibility is not required, as this limits the attack surface.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Socet GxpApplication
Affected:< 4.6.0.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify BAE SOCET GXP installation
    Locate the SOCET GXP installation on the system using standard software inventory or file system inspection methods
    Affected if The software is present on the system
  2. Determine installed version
    Check the version information for the installed SOCET GXP instance (typically accessible via program properties, version file, or the executable)
    Affected if The installed version is prior to 4.6.0.2
  3. Inspect Job Service accessibility
    Examine the Job Service configuration to determine whether it is bound to network-accessible interfaces or configured for local-only access
    Affected if The Job Service is network-accessible (allowing remote command execution) or accessible to users with local access (allowing privilege escalation)

The environment is affected if BAE SOCET GXP is installed with a version prior to 4.6.0.2 and the Job Service is accessible, regardless of whether it is network-facing or local-only.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 4.6.0.2 or later
Fixed in 4.6.0.2
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to BAE SOCET GXP version 4.6.0.2 or later to obtain the patch. Additionally, restrict the Job Service to local-only access if network accessibility is not required, as this limits the attack surface.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

SOCET GXP 4.6.0.2

  1. Verify current SOCET GXP version through the administration interface or system information
  2. Create a complete backup of the SOCET GXP configuration, databases, and associated data
  3. Review the official BAE Systems SOCET GXP 4.6.0.2 release notes for any specific upgrade requirements or注意事项
  4. Download the SOCET GXP 4.6.0.2 upgrade package from the official BAE Systems or Geospatial Exploitation Products download portal
  5. Execute the upgrade following the official installation/upgrade guide provided by BAE Systems
  6. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the software version displays 4.6.0.2 or later
  7. Test the GXP Job Service functionality to confirm normal operation
Caveat Specific breaking changes not detailed in provided material; review release notes before upgrading

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Socet Gxp Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-54964 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-54964 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data