CVE-2025-54970
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in BAE SOCET GXP before 4.6.0.2. The SOCET GXP Job Status Service fails to authenticate requests. In some configurations, this may allow remote or local users to abort jobs or read information without the permissions of the job owner.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe SOCET GXP Job Status Service in versions prior to 4.6.0.2 does not properly authenticate incoming requests. This allows unauthenticated remote or local users to abort running jobs and read job information without proper authorization checks, bypassing the intended permission model of job ownership.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 4.6.0.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed SOCET GXP versionLocate the SOCET GXP installation and determine the exact version number through the software's about dialog, installation directory version file, or system-installed programs listAffected if The installed version is any release prior to 4.6.0.2
-
Verify Job Status Service is present and runningCheck for the SOCET GXP Job Status Service in the list of running Windows services or processes, typically visible as a service named related to Job Status or GXP status monitoringAffected if The Job Status Service is installed and running on the system
-
Test unauthenticated access to Job Status ServiceAttempt to access the Job Status Service API or interface without providing any authentication credentials - for example, by making a local or remote request to the service endpoint if exposed over networkAffected if The service accepts and processes requests without requiring authentication or authorization
-
Inspect Job Status Service configurationReview configuration files or settings associated with the Job Status Service to determine whether authentication enforcement is enabled or configuredAffected if Authentication is disabled, not enforced, or improperly configured in the service settings
A system is affected if it runs any version of Baesystems SOCET GXP prior to 4.6.0.2 with the Job Status Service accessible without authentication credentials.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.6.0.2
Upgrade BAE SOCET GXP to version 4.6.0.2 or later to obtain the patched Job Status Service with proper authentication. Review configurations where unauthenticated access may have been possible.
4.6.0.2
- Verify the current installed version of SOCET GXP by checking the application or system information
- Back up all SOCET GXP databases, configuration files, and user data according to enterprise backup procedures
- Download SOCET GXP version 4.6.0.2 or later from the BAE Systems geospatial portal (geospatialexploitationproducts.com) or authorized distribution channel
- Stop all SOCET GXP services, including the Job Status Service, using the appropriate service management tool
- Run the installer for version 4.6.0.2 following the BAE Systems installation guide for your platform
- After installation, verify the new version number matches 4.6.0.2 or later
- Restart all SOCET GXP services
- Test the Job Status Service to confirm authentication is now required for job operations
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,640.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-54970 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-54970 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data