CVE-2025-54988
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCritical XXE in Apache Tika (tika-parser-pdf-module) in Apache Tika 1.13 through and including 3.2.1 on all platforms allows an attacker to carry out XML External Entity injection via a crafted XFA file inside of a PDF. An attacker may be able to read sensitive data or trigger malicious requests to internal resources or third-party servers. Note that the tika-parser-pdf-module is used as a dependency in several Tika packages including at least: tika-parsers-standard-modules, tika-parsers-standard-package, tika-app, tika-grpc and tika-server-standard. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.2.2, which fixes this issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCritical XXE (XML External Entity) injection vulnerability in Apache Tika's tika-parser-pdf-module allows attackers to embed crafted XFA (XML Forms Architecture) data within PDF files. When processed, the malicious XFA content triggers XXE, enabling unauthorized file system access or SSRF attacks against internal infrastructure.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 1.13, < 3.2.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed Apache Tika versionRun the Tika version check command (e.g., tika-server --version, or inspect the Tika JAR/dependency manifest file for the version attribute)Affected if The detected version is greater than or equal to 1.13 AND less than 3.2.2 (for example, 2.1.0, 2.0.1, or 1.28 would be affected)
-
Locate the tika-parser-pdf-module componentInspect your Tika installation or dependency tree for the presence of the tika-parser-pdf-module JAR file or package, typically named tika-parser-pdf-module-x.x.x.jarAffected if The tika-parser-pdf-module is present in your Tika deployment
-
Confirm PDF parsing functionality is enabledCheck your Tika configuration or application code to verify that PDF parsing is actively enabled or being used (look for PDFParser being loaded or referenced)Affected if PDF parsing is enabled and the Tika version falls within the affected range
-
Determine if untrusted PDF files are processedReview your application's data flow to identify whether PDF files from external or untrusted sources are submitted to Tika for parsingAffected if Your application processes PDF files from external or untrusted sources using a vulnerable Tika version
You are affected if your Apache Tika installation version is >=1.13 and <3.2.2 and your application uses the tika-parser-pdf-module to process untrusted PDF files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.2.2
Upgrade Apache Tika to version 3.2.2 or later to resolve the XXE vulnerability in the PDF parsing module.
Apache Tika 3.2.2
- 1. Identify all Apache Tika dependencies in your project that include tika-parser-pdf-module (including: tika-parsers-standard-modules, tika-parsers-standard-package, tika-app, tika-grpc, and tika-server-standard)
- 2. Update the Apache Tika dependency version to 3.2.2 in your build configuration (Maven pom.xml, Gradle build.gradle, or equivalent)
- 3. Rebuild and redeploy your application
- 4. Test that PDF parsing functionality still works correctly with your use cases
- 5. Verify that the application no longer processes XFA files in a way that allows XXE injection
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,464.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-54988 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-54988 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data