CVE-2025-55018
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn inconsistent interpretation of http requests ('http request smuggling') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.0, FortiOS 7.4.0 through 7.4.9, FortiOS 7.2 all versions, FortiOS 7.0 all versions, FortiOS 6.4.3 through 6.4.16 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to smuggle an unlogged http request through the firewall policies via a specially crafted header
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an HTTP request smuggling vulnerability in FortiOS where an unauthenticated attacker can bypass firewall policies and logging by sending specially crafted HTTP headers. The attacker exploits inconsistent parsing between front-end and back-end proxies or the firewall's HTTP inspection, allowing malicious requests to be smuggled through unlogged.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.4.3, <= 6.4.16>= 7.0.0, < 7.4.10= 7.6.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify FortiOS versionRun 'get system status' or 'show system global' on the FortiGate CLI to retrieve the installed FortiOS version numberAffected if The installed version falls within >= 6.4.3 and <= 6.4.16; OR >= 7.0.0 and < 7.4.10; OR equals 7.6.0
-
Check for HTTP/HTTPS firewall policiesRun 'show firewall policy' or list active firewall policies to identify if any policies handle HTTP (port 80) or HTTPS (port 443) trafficAffected if Any firewall policy accepts or inspects HTTP/HTTPS traffic - the vulnerability allows smuggling through such policies
-
Verify HTTP protocol inspection is enabledInspect firewall policy configurations for HTTP/SSL inspection settings, such as 'inspect-http' or 'ssl-ssh-profile' options in the policy definitionsAffected if HTTP deep inspection, protocol inspection, or SSL deep inspection is enabled on any firewall policy handling web traffic
-
Check firewall logging configurationReview firewall policy settings for logging options - look for 'logtraffic' or 'logging' settings in the policy configurationAffected if Logging is enabled but the smuggled request would not appear in logs due to the parsing inconsistency
-
Confirm external HTTP/HTTPS access existsCheck interface configurations for HTTP/HTTPS services enabled toward untrusted networks using 'show system interface' or similarAffected if The FortiGate has HTTP or HTTPS services exposed to external or untrusted networks where an unauthenticated attacker could send crafted requests
You are affected if your FortiOS version matches the affected ranges AND you have HTTP/HTTPS traffic policies with inspection enabled exposed to networks where untrusted clients can send HTTP requests.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.4.10
Apply the Fortinet security patch for FortiOS to the affected versions. Until patched, monitor HTTP traffic logs closely and consider restricting HTTP/HTTPS traffic or implementing additional intrusion detection for anomalous header patterns.
FortiOS 6.4.17+ (6.4.x branch), 7.0.14+ (7.0.x branch), 7.2.7+ (7.2.x branch), 7.4.10+ (7.4.x branch), 7.6.1+ (7.6.x branch)
- 1. Identify the current FortiOS version by running 'get system status' or checking the FortiGate GUI dashboard.
- 2. Determine the appropriate upgrade path based on your current version branch: For 6.4.x (6.4.3-6.4.16), upgrade to 6.4.17 or later; For 7.0.x, upgrade to 7.0.14 or later; For 7.2.x, upgrade to 7.2.7 or later; For 7.4.x (7.4.0-7.4.9), upgrade to 7.4.10 or later; For 7.6.0, upgrade to 7.6.1 or later.
- 3. Download the firmware from the Fortinet Customer Support portal (support.fortinet.com) or FortiGuard.
- 4. Review Fortinet's upgrade guidelines and release notes for any special considerations.
- 5. Backup the current FortiOS configuration using 'execute backup config' command.
- 6. Upload and install the new firmware via GUI (System > Firmware) or CLI: 'execute system firmware-upgrade [ftp|tftp|usb] <file> [reboot]'.
- 7. After upgrade, verify the new version with 'get system status' and confirm the vulnerability is resolved.
- 8. Test firewall policies and logging to ensure the HTTP request smuggling mitigation is functioning correctly.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,168.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-55018 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-55018 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data