Threadx Netx DuoApplication · Eclipse

CVE-2025-55081

CRITICAL · 9.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-10-15
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 6.4.4.202503 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In Eclipse Foundation NextX Duo before 6.4.4, a module of ThreadX, the _nx_secure_tls_process_clienthello() function was missing length verification of certain SSL/TLS client hello message: the ciphersuite length and compression method length. In case of an attacker-crafted message with values outside of the expected range, it could cause an out-of-bound read.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A missing bounds check vulnerability in ThreadX's TLS implementation allows an attacker sending a specially crafted TLS ClientHello message to trigger an out-of-bounds read. The _nx_secure_tls_process_clienthello() function fails to validate the ciphersuite length and compression method length fields before using them, which can be exploited with values outside expected ranges.

MitigationUpgrade Eclipse Foundation NextX Duo to version 6.4.4 or later to obtain the patched version that includes proper length validation for ciphersuite and compression method fields in TLS ClientHello processing.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Threadx Netx DuoApplication
Affected:< 6.4.4.202503

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify ThreadX NetX Duo version
    Check the NetX Duo library version in your build artifacts, header files, or firmware (often in nx_secure.h or similar version headers). Look for a version string or build timestamp.
    Affected if The installed version is earlier than 6.4.4.202503.
  2. Verify TLS support is enabled
    Inspect your build configuration or source code to confirm NX_SECURE_TLS is defined and the TLS module is compiled into the firmware image.
    Affected if TLS support is enabled in the build.
  3. Confirm TLS server role is used
    Review your application code to determine if the device accepts incoming TLS connections (acts as a TLS server) using nx_secure_tls_server_start or equivalent TLS server APIs.
    Affected if The device functions as a TLS server accepting ClientHello messages from clients.
  4. Check for ClientHello processing path
    Search the firmware or source for calls to _nx_secure_tls_process_clienthello or nx_secure_tls_client_handshake to confirm the TLS handshake processing path exists.
    Affected if The code includes TLS ClientHello processing for incoming connections.

A device is affected if it runs Eclipse ThreadX NetX Duo versions before 6.4.4.202503, has TLS enabled, and accepts incoming TLS connections where it processes ClientHello messages.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 6.4.4.202503 or later
Fixed in 6.4.4.202503
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Eclipse Foundation NextX Duo to version 6.4.4 or later to obtain the patched version that includes proper length validation for ciphersuite and compression method fields in TLS ClientHello processing.

Recommended fix High confidence

6.4.4.202503

  1. Upgrade Eclipse ThreadX NetX Duo to version 6.4.4.202503 or later

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Threadx Netx Duo Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
24.0 hours of engineering $4,160
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-55081 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-55081 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data