CVE-2025-55102
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA denial-of-service vulnerability exists in the NetX IPv6 component functionality of Eclipse ThreadX NetX Duo. A specially crafted network packet of "Packet Too Big" with more than 15 different source address can lead to denial of service. An attacker can send a malicious packet to trigger this vulnerability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA denial-of-service vulnerability exists in Eclipse ThreadX NetX Duo's IPv6 component. Specially crafted ICMPv6 'Packet Too Big' messages containing more than 15 different source addresses can trigger the vulnerability, likely causing resource exhaustion or processing loop leading to system denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.4.5.202504CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify NetX Duo usageLocate the NetX Duo library or check firmware/components that depend on Eclipse ThreadX NetX Duo. In embedded systems, this may be a compiled library (nx*.a, nx*.lib) or part of the firmware image.Affected if The system uses Eclipse ThreadX NetX Duo as its network stack
-
Check NetX Duo versionRetrieve the version information from the NetX Duo library file or build system. Common methods: examine the library filename containing version, check version macros in headers (e.g., NX_VERSION_MAJOR/NX_VERSION_MINOR), or query via API nx_system_version_get() if available.Affected if The installed version is earlier than 6.4.5.202504 (e.g., 6.4.4, 6.3.x, etc.)
-
Verify IPv6 is enabledCheck NetX Duo configuration: examine the build configuration file or #define statements for NX_ENABLE_IPV6 or NX_IPV6_ENABLED set to 1. In runtime, verify via API call nx_ip_status_check() with NX_IPV6_ENABLED status.Affected if IPv6 support is enabled in the NetX Duo configuration (required for the attack surface)
-
Confirm ICMPv6 processing is activeCheck if ICMPv6 is enabled via NX_ENABLE_ICMPV6 or NX_ICMPv6_ENABLE configuration. Additionally, verify the device has an IPv6 address assigned (active IPv6 interface) which is necessary for receiving ICMPv6 'Packet Too Big' messages.Affected if ICMPv6 is enabled and the device has an active IPv6 interface
A system is affected if it runs a version of Eclipse ThreadX NetX Duo earlier than 6.4.5.202504 with IPv6 and ICMPv6 enabled, and the device can receive ICMPv6 messages on its IPv6 interface.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.4.5.202504
Apply vendor patches for Eclipse ThreadX NetX Duo when available; implement network-level filtering or rate-limiting for ICMPv6 'Packet Too Big' messages with excessive source addresses as a compensating control.
Eclipse ThreadX NetX Duo version 6.4.5.202504 or later
- 1. Identify the current Eclipse ThreadX NetX Duo version in use by checking the build configuration or library manifest
- 2. Obtain Eclipse ThreadX NetX Duo version 6.4.5.202504 or later from the official Eclipse Foundation distribution (download.eclipse.org/threadx) or your vendor's software distribution
- 3. Replace the existing NetX Duo library binary with the updated version 6.4.5.202504 or newer
- 4. Rebuild the firmware/application with the updated NetX Duo library
- 5. Test the IPv6 functionality to ensure normal operation after the upgrade
- 6. Verify that the 'Packet Too Big' ICMPv6 message handling no longer causes uncontrolled resource consumption
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-55102 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-55102 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data