CVE-2025-55116
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA buffer overflow in the Control-M/Agent can lead to a local privilege escalation when an attacker has access to the system running the Agent. This vulnerability impacts the out-of-support Control-M/Agent versions 9.0.18 to 9.0.20 and potentially earlier unsupported versions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA buffer overflow vulnerability in BMC Control-M/Agent versions 9.0.18 through 9.0.20 allows a local attacker with system access to execute arbitrary code and escalate privileges, likely by overflowing a stack or heap buffer in the agent process.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 9.0.20.100CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate Control-M/Agent installation directorySearch for Control-M installation folders: on Linux/Unix check /opt/control-m/agent, /opt/control-m/, or run 'find /opt -name "*control*" -type d 2>/dev/null'; on Windows check C:\Program Files\BMC Software\Control-M Agent or use registry key HKLM\SOFTWARE\BMC Software\Control-MAffected if The Control-M/Agent software is found installed on the system
-
Identify installed agent versionLook for version file in the installation directory (commonly named version.txt, VERSION, or .version) or run version command if available (ctmversion, ctmadmin --version, or agent --version in the bin folder)Affected if Cannot determine the version - manual inspection of version information is required
-
Compare version to affected rangeParse the version number found (format appears to be 9.0.x.x) and compare against 9.0.20.100 - any version less than 9.0.20.100 is affectedAffected if Installed version is lower than 9.0.20.100 (for example: 9.0.18, 9.0.19, 9.0.20, 9.0.20.50, etc.)
-
Verify agent process is runningCheck for running agent processes: on Linux/Unix run 'ps -ef | grep -i "ctm"' or 'ps -ef | grep -i "control-m"'; on Windows run 'tasklist | findstr /i "ctm"' or check Windows Services for Control-M Agent serviceAffected if The agent process/service is actively running - this enables local privilege escalation if exploited
The system is affected if BMC Control-M/Agent is installed with any version lower than 9.0.20.100 and the agent is running or installed on the target system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.0.20.100
Upgrade Control-M/Agent to a supported version; if immediate upgrade is not feasible, restrict physical and logical access to systems running the agent and monitor for exploitation indicators.
Control-M/Agent version 9.0.20.100 or later
- 1. Identify the current Control-M/Agent version by running: ctmversion or checking the agent installation directory
- 2. Plan upgrade to Control-M/Agent version 9.0.20.100 or later
- 3. Review BMC Control-M release notes and upgrade documentation for version 9.0.20.100
- 4. Create a full backup of the Control-M/Agent configuration directory
- 5. Stop the Control-M/Agent service before upgrading
- 6. Download the Control-M/Agent installation package for version 9.0.20.100 or later from BMC (https://bmcapps.my.site.com)
- 7. Run the installer as administrator to upgrade the agent
- 8. Restart the Control-M/Agent service after upgrade completes
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-55116 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-55116 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data