CVE-2025-55130
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw in Node.js’s Permissions model allows attackers to bypass `--allow-fs-read` and `--allow-fs-write` restrictions using crafted relative symlink paths. By chaining directories and symlinks, a script granted access only to the current directory can escape the allowed path and read sensitive files. This breaks the expected isolation guarantees and enables arbitrary file read/write, leading to potential system compromise. This vulnerability affects users of the permission model on Node.js v20, v22, v24, and v25.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceNode.js's permission model fails to properly validate relative symlink paths when --allow-fs-read or --allow-fs-write restrictions are applied. Attackers can chain directories and symlinks to escape the intended path isolation and access arbitrary files outside the allowed scope, breaking the security boundaries of the permission model.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 20.0.0, < 20.20.0>= 22.0.0, < 22.22.0>= 24.0.0, < 24.13.0>= 25.0.0, < 25.3.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed Node.js versionRun `node --version` to get the version number (e.g., v20.19.0)Affected if The version falls within >= 20.0.0 and < 20.20.0, OR >= 22.0.0 and < 22.22.0, OR >= 24.0.0 and < 24.13.0, OR >= 25.0.0 and < 25.3.0
-
Verify permission model is in useCheck if the Node.js process was launched with --allow-fs-read or --allow-fs-write flags. Review command line arguments, startup scripts, or process documentation.Affected if The Node.js process uses the permission model with --allow-fs-read or --allow-fs-write restrictions to limit filesystem access
-
Identify allowed directoriesReview the paths specified with --allow-fs-read or --allow-fs-write flags. These are the directories the permission model intends to restrict access to.Affected if Allowed directories are defined and the attacker could potentially access paths outside them
-
Inspect for symlinks in allowed pathsUse `find <allowed_dir> -type l -ls` to list all symbolic links within allowed directories. Also check parent directories that could be chained.Affected if Symbolic links exist within allowed directories that could be chained to point to directories outside the allowed path scope (e.g., symlinks using relative paths like ../../../etc)
You are affected if your Node.js version is in one of the affected ranges AND you use the permission model with --allow-fs-read or --allow-fs-write restrictions, AND your allowed directories contain or could be reached via symlinks that could escape the intended boundary.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped20.20.022.22.024.13.0
Upgrade Node.js to patched versions once available; for interim protection, avoid granting filesystem permissions to untrusted code and consider additional sandboxing layers such as containers or VMs.
Node.js 20.20.0+ (for 20.x users), 22.22.0+ (for 22.x users), 24.13.0+ (for 24.x users), or 25.3.0+ (for 25.x users)
- Identify the currently installed Node.js version using 'node --version'
- If running Node.js 20.x (20.0.0 - 20.19.x), upgrade to version 20.20.0 or later
- If running Node.js 22.x (22.0.0 - 22.21.x), upgrade to version 22.22.0 or later
- If running Node.js 24.x (24.0.0 - 24.12.x), upgrade to version 24.13.0 or later
- If running Node.js 25.x (25.0.0 - 25.2.x), upgrade to version 25.3.0 or later
- Upgrade using your preferred package manager (nvm, npm, or direct download from nodejs.org)
- Verify the new version is active: 'node --version'
- Test that your permission-based scripts still function correctly with the new Node.js version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-55130 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- nodejs.org
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- security.access.redhat.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-55130 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data