CVE-2026-21636
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw in Node.js's permission model allows Unix Domain Socket (UDS) connections to bypass network restrictions when `--permission` is enabled. Even without `--allow-net`, attacker-controlled inputs (such as URLs or socketPath options) can connect to arbitrary local sockets via net, tls, or undici/fetch. This breaks the intended security boundary of the permission model and enables access to privileged local services, potentially leading to privilege escalation, data exposure, or local code execution. * The issue affects users of the Node.js permission model on version v25. In the moment of this vulnerability, network permissions (`--allow-net`) are still in the experimental phase.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceNode.js v25's experimental permission model (--permission) incorrectly treats Unix Domain Socket (UDS) connections as non-network, allowing them to bypass --allow-net restrictions. Attacker-controlled inputs like URLs or socketPath options in net, tls, or undici/fetch can connect to arbitrary local sockets, breaking the security boundary and enabling access to privileged local services.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 25.0.0, < 25.3.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Node.js versionRun 'node --version' to determine the installed Node.js versionAffected if Version is >= 25.0.0 and < 25.3.0
-
Verify permission model is enabledCheck if Node.js is launched with --experimental-permission flag or if process.permission is defined in the applicationAffected if The experimental permission model is enabled (--experimental-permission flag present or process.permission exists)
-
Confirm network restrictions are in placeCheck if Node.js is launched without --allow-net or with --allow-net set to false/limited valuesAffected if --allow-net is explicitly restricted or not granted in the permission configuration
-
Identify applications using network APIs with user inputReview code for usage of net.connect(), tls.connect(), undici.fetch(), or node:net/node:tls/node:fetch with socketPath or URL inputs that could be user-controlledAffected if The application passes user-supplied socketPath options or URLs to network APIs without sanitization
You are affected if running Node.js 25.0.0-25.2.x with the experimental permission model enabled and with network restrictions (--allow-net not granted), and your application uses network APIs with user-controlled socketPath or URL inputs that could reference Unix Domain Sockets.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped25.3.0
Avoid using untrusted input with socketPath options; consider disabling the experimental permission model until the patch is available; implement additional input validation for socket paths.
Node.js 25.3.0 or later
- Check current Node.js version by running: node --version
- If running a version >= 25.0.0 and < 25.3.0, plan for upgrade
- Upgrade to Node.js 25.3.0 or later using your preferred package manager (nvm, n, or official installers)
- Verify the new version: node --version
- Re-test your application with the --permission flag to confirm the security boundary is enforced correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,352.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-21636 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-21636 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data