CVE-2025-55150
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedStirling-PDF is a locally hosted web application that performs various operations on PDF files. Prior to version 1.1.0, when using the /api/v1/convert/html/pdf endpoint to convert HTML to PDF, the backend calls a third-party tool to process it and includes a sanitizer for security sanitization which can be bypassed and result in SSRF. This issue has been patched in version 1.1.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStirling-PDF prior to version 1.1.0 contains an SSRF vulnerability in the /api/v1/convert/html/pdf endpoint. The backend calls a third-party tool to process HTML-to-PDF conversions, and a security sanitizer intended to prevent malicious requests can be bypassed, allowing attackers to make the server perform arbitrary requests to internal or external resources.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Stirling-PDF versionLocate the Stirling-PDF application and check its version number (typically visible in the web UI footer, in startup logs, or via API endpoint like /api/v1/info/version). Compare it to the affected range: versions prior to 1.1.0 are vulnerable.Affected if The installed version is less than 1.1.0.
-
Confirm the vulnerable endpoint is exposedVerify that the web interface or API is accessible and that the /api/v1/convert/html/pdf endpoint is available. This endpoint handles HTML-to-PDF conversion requests.Affected if The endpoint /api/v1/convert/html/pdf is accessible and functional.
-
Check for outbound network accessInspect the Stirling-PDF server network configuration and firewall rules to determine whether the application process can initiate outbound HTTP/HTTPS requests to arbitrary addresses.Affected if The Stirling-PDF server has unrestricted outbound network access.
-
Review access logs for suspicious requestsExamine application access logs and web server logs for requests to /api/v1/convert/html/pdf that contain unusual URLs, internal IP addresses (such as 127.0.0.1, 192.168.x.x, 10.x.x.x), or cloud metadata endpoints (such as 169.254.169.254).Affected if Logs contain evidence of SSRF attempts or unexpected internal resource access via the HTML-to-PDF endpoint.
You are affected if Stirling-PDF version is below 1.1.0 AND the /api/v1/convert/html/pdf endpoint is accessible and enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.1.0
Upgrade to Stirling-PDF version 1.1.0 or later to patch the sanitizer bypass. As a locally hosted application, network segmentation and restricting outbound access from the server provide additional defense-in-depth layers.
1.1.0
- Verify current version by checking the running container or application version
- Backup any existing data, configurations, and PDF files stored in the application
- If using Docker, pull the latest image tag 1.1.0 or the specific version tag: docker pull stirlingtools/stirling-pdf:1.1.0
- Redeploy the container with the new image version
- If using manual installation, download Stirling-PDF version 1.1.0 from the official releases and replace the existing installation
- Restart the application service
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the application version and testing the /api/v1/convert/html/pdf endpoint
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-55150 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-55150 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data