CVE-2025-55161
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedStirling-PDF is a locally hosted web application that performs various operations on PDF files. Prior to version 1.1.0, when using the /api/v1/convert/markdown/pdf endpoint to convert Markdown to PDF, the backend calls a third-party tool to process it and includes a sanitizer for security sanitization which can be bypassed and result in SSRF. This issue has been patched in version 1.1.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceStirling-PDF versions prior to 1.1.0 contain an SSRF vulnerability in the /api/v1/convert/markdown/pdf endpoint. The backend invokes a third-party tool to process Markdown-to-PDF conversions and includes a security sanitizer, but this sanitizer can be bypassed, allowing attackers to make the server perform arbitrary requests to internal or external resources.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Stirling-PDF is runningIdentify if the Stirling-PDF application is running in your environment by checking running processes, docker containers, or accessible web services (commonly on ports 8080, 80, or 443). Look for the application's web interface in your browser or via network scanning.Affected if Stirling-PDF is found running in your environment
-
Determine the installed versionCheck the installed version by accessing the application's Settings or About page in the web UI, or by inspecting the docker image tag, build configuration, or version file if you deployed manually.Affected if The version is less than 1.1.0 (any version prior to 1.1.0)
-
Verify the markdown-to-PDF conversion feature is availableCheck if the /api/v1/convert/markdown/pdf endpoint is accessible in your instance by reviewing the application's available conversion options in the UI or attempting to access the endpoint directly via HTTP request.Affected if The markdown-to-PDF conversion functionality is present and the endpoint responds to requests
-
Check network accessibility of the serverDetermine if the server hosting Stirling-PDF has the ability to make outbound HTTP/HTTPS requests to other internal or external resources, as this is required for the SSRF vulnerability to be exploitable.Affected if The Stirling-PDF server can initiate outbound network connections
You are affected if Stirling-PDF version less than 1.1.0 is running with the markdown-to-PDF conversion feature enabled and the server has network access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.1.0
Upgrade to Stirling-PDF version 1.1.0 or later. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict network access to the application and consider disabling the markdown-to-PDF conversion functionality as a temporary workaround.
version 1.1.0
- 1. Back up your current Stirling-PDF installation and configuration files.
- 2. Download version 1.1.0 of Stirling-PDF from the official GitHub repository (https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/releases/tag/1.1.0).
- 3. Stop the running Stirling-PDF service.
- 4. Replace the existing installation with the new version 1.1.0 files.
- 5. Restore your backed-up configuration files to the new installation.
- 6. Start the Stirling-PDF service and verify it is running correctly.
- 7. Test the /api/v1/convert/markdown/pdf endpoint to confirm the SSRF vulnerability is patched.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-55161 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-55161 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data