CVE-2025-5698
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in Brilliance Golden Link Secondary System up to 20250424. Affected is an unknown function of the file /sysframework/logSelect.htm. The manipulation of the argument nodename leads to sql injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA critical SQL injection vulnerability exists in Brilliance Golden Link Secondary System (up to 20250424) in the /sysframework/logSelect.htm endpoint. The 'nodename' parameter is vulnerable to SQL injection, allowing remote attackers to manipulate database queries. The exploit has been publicly disclosed, increasing exploitation risk.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2025-04-24CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm product identityIdentify if the system is Brilliance Golden Link Secondary System by reviewing installed software, system documentation, or web application banner informationAffected if The system is not Brilliance Golden Link Secondary System (not applicable)
-
Check installed versionLocate the installed version or build date of Brilliance Golden Link Secondary System in system files, admin panels, or application metadataAffected if The installed version or build date is on or before 2025-04-24
-
Identify endpoint exposureScan network-accessible web paths or review web server configuration to determine if /sysframework/logSelect.htm is accessibleAffected if The endpoint /sysframework/logSelect.htm is exposed and reachable
-
Verify vulnerable parameter handlingExamine application source code, configuration, or intercept HTTP requests to the logSelect.htm endpoint to check how the 'nodename' parameter is processedAffected if The nodename parameter is processed without parameterized queries or input validation
-
Check network accessibilityReview firewall rules, network segmentation, or ACLs to determine if the web interface is accessible from untrusted networksAffected if The vulnerable endpoint is accessible from external or untrusted networks
A system is affected if it is Brilliance Golden Link Secondary System with version or build date on or before 2025-04-24 and the /sysframework/logSelect.htm endpoint with the nodename parameter is accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImmediate mitigation requires implementing parameterized queries or prepared statements for the nodename parameter, adding input validation, and restricting database privileges. Until the fix is deployed, network-level filtering should be considered.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-5698 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-5698 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data