CVE-2025-6276
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was found in Brilliance Golden Link Secondary System up to 20250609. It has been rated as critical. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /storagework/rentTakeInfoPage.htm. The manipulation of the argument custTradeName leads to sql injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA SQL injection vulnerability exists in the Brilliance Golden Link Secondary System (up to 20250609) in the /storagework/rentTakeInfoPage.htm file. The custTradeName parameter is not properly sanitized, allowing remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries. With a CVSS 9.8, this critical flaw can allow complete database compromise and potentially remote code execution depending on database configuration.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2025-06-09CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Brilliance Golden Link Secondary System is deployedLocate the application in your environment by checking web server directories, application inventories, or by searching for files containing 'Golden Link' or 'Brilliance' brandingAffected if The system is present in your environment and no compensating controls are in place
-
Determine the installed version or build timestampCheck the application version, build date, or file timestamps of the Brilliance Golden Link installation. Compare against the affected date 2025-06-09Affected if The version date is 20250609 or earlier, meaning the patch has not been applied
-
Locate the vulnerable fileSearch for the file /storagework/rentTakeInfoPage.htm in the web root or application directory of the Brilliance Golden Link installationAffected if The file exists in the application and is accessible via the web interface
-
Verify the custTradeName parameter is exposedAccess the URL endpoint containing /storagework/rentTakeInfoPage.htm and confirm the custTradeName parameter is accepted as user input (via GET or POST request)Affected if The parameter accepts user-supplied values without apparent validation or parameterization
If the Brilliance Golden Link Secondary System is installed with version date 20250609 or earlier and the /storagework/rentTakeInfoPage.htm endpoint is accessible with the custTradeName parameter exposed, the environment is affected by this SQL injection vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement parameterized queries or prepared statements for the custTradeName parameter and all user inputs. Apply input validation and output encoding. If available, apply vendor patch for versions after 20250609. Consider WAF deployment as temporary mitigation.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-6276 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-6276 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data