CVE-2025-57772
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDataEase is an open source business intelligence and data visualization tool. Prior to version 2.10.12, there is a H2 JDBC RCE bypass in DataEase. If the JDBC URL meets criteria, the getJdbcUrl method is returned, which acts as the getter for the JdbcUrl parameter provided. This bypasses H2's filtering logic and returns the H2 JDBC URL, allowing the "driver":"org.h2.Driver" to specify the H2 driver for the JDBC connection. The vulnerability has been fixed in version 2.10.12.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceDataEase prior to version 2.10.12 contains an H2 JDBC RCE bypass. The getJdbcUrl method acts as a getter for the JdbcUrl parameter and returns the JDBC URL in a way that bypasses H2's filtering logic. This allows attackers to specify 'driver':'org.h2.Driver' in the JDBC connection, enabling remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.10.12CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify DataEase versionLog into the DataEase web interface and navigate to 'About' or 'System Settings' to view the installed version. If deployed via Docker, run 'docker ps' to find the container, then 'docker inspect <container>' or check the image tag for the version.Affected if The displayed version is below 2.10.12 (e.g., 2.10.11, 2.10.10, etc.)
-
Confirm JDBC connection feature is accessibleIn the DataEase web interface, navigate to the data source or connection configuration section where users can add or edit JDBC database connections.Affected if Users with appropriate permissions can create or modify JDBC connection configurations through the web interface
-
Check for H2 database connectionsReview existing data source configurations in DataEase for any connections using the H2 database driver (org.h2.Driver) or H2 JDBC URLs (typically starting with 'jdbc:h2:').Affected if Any JDBC data source is configured with H2 driver or H2 JDBC URL string
-
Verify network exposure of DataEaseCheck if the DataEase web interface is accessible from untrusted networks by reviewing firewall rules, reverse proxy configurations, or cloud security group settings.Affected if DataEase HTTP/HTTPS ports (default 8080, 443, or custom) are exposed to the public internet or untrusted internal networks
A user is affected if their DataEase version is below 2.10.12 AND the web interface with JDBC connection configuration is accessible (especially over network), allowing potential attackers to inject a malicious JDBC connection with the H2 driver to achieve RCE.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.10.12
Upgrade DataEase to version 2.10.12 or later to patch the H2 JDBC RCE bypass. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to DataEase interfaces and audit JDBC connection configurations.
2.10.12
- Upgrade DataEase to version 2.10.12 or later to address the H2 JDBC RCE bypass vulnerability
- After upgrade, verify that the JDBC URL filtering is working correctly and the getJdbcUrl method bypass is no longer present
- Review DataEase release notes for version 2.10.12 to confirm all security patches are included
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,848.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-57772 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-57772 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data