CVE-2025-58046
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDataease is an open-source data visualization and analysis platform. In versions up to and including 2.10.12, the Impala data source is vulnerable to remote code execution due to insufficient filtering in the getJdbc method of the io.dataease.datasource.type.Impala class. Attackers can construct malicious JDBC connection strings that exploit JNDI injection and trigger RMI deserialization, ultimately enabling remote command execution. The vulnerability can be exploited by editing the data source and providing a crafted JDBC connection string that references a remote configuration file, leading to RMI-based deserialization attacks. This issue has been patched in version 2.10.13. It is recommended to upgrade to the latest version. No known workarounds exist for affected versions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceDataease versions up to 2.10.12 contain an RCE vulnerability in the Impala data source connector. The getJdbc method in io.dataease.datasource.type.Impala lacks proper filtering of JDBC connection strings, allowing JNDI injection where attackers embed malicious RMI references in the connection string to trigger deserialization and achieve remote command execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.10.13CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Dataease versionCheck the Dataease version by logging into the application and navigating to 'About' or 'System Settings', or inspect the version.properties/version.json file in the Dataease installation directory.Affected if The installed version is any release prior to 2.10.13 (versions 2.10.12 and below are affected).
-
Verify if Impala data source is configuredIn the Dataease web interface, navigate to 'Data Sources' or 'Data Source Management' and examine the list of configured data sources. Look for any data source with type 'Impala' or 'Impala JDBC'.Affected if An Impala data source is present in the configuration, meaning the vulnerable getJdbc method could process malicious connection strings.
-
Inspect JDBC connection string handlingDecompile or inspect the Impala.java class file, specifically the getJdbc method. Look for whether the JDBC URL/connection string is passed directly to the driver without sanitization or allowlist validation.Affected if The getJdbc method accepts and uses the JDBC connection string directly without filtering out patterns like 'ldap://', 'rmi://', or other JNDI lookup protocols.
If the Dataease version is below 2.10.13 AND the Impala connector class exists (regardless of whether an Impala data source is actively configured), the environment is vulnerable to CVE-2025-58046.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.10.13
Upgrade to Dataease version 2.10.13 or later. No workarounds exist for affected versions; immediate patching is required given the critical CVSS score.
2.10.13
- Upgrade Dataease to version 2.10.13 or later as the vulnerability has been patched in that release
- After upgrading, verify the Impala data source connector now properly filters JDBC connection strings
- Review existing Impala data source configurations to ensure no malicious connection strings were introduced prior to the upgrade
- If unable to upgrade immediately, disable the Impala data source type until the upgrade can be performed
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-58046 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-58046 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data