CVE-2025-58474
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWhen BIG-IP Advanced WAF is configured on a virtual server with Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) protection or when an NGINX server is configured with App Protect Bot Defense, undisclosed requests can disrupt new client requests. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a denial-of-service vulnerability where specifically crafted undisclosed requests, when BIG-IP Advanced WAF is configured with SSRF protection or NGINX has App Protect Bot Defense enabled, can disrupt processing of new client requests to affected virtual servers.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 17.1.0, < 17.1.2>= 17.1.0, < 17.1.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check BIG-IP versionRetrieve the installed version of F5 BIG-IP Advanced WAF or Application Security Manager using the management interface or CLI command 'tmsh show sys version'. Compare the version number to the affected range: >= 17.1.0 and < 17.1.2.Affected if The installed version falls within 17.1.0 <= version < 17.1.2
-
Confirm Advanced WAF module is licensed and provisionedVerify that the Advanced WAF (AWAF) module is provisioned on the BIG-IP system using 'tmsh list sys provision' or through the management console.Affected if Advanced WAF is provisioned and running
-
Check if SSRF protection is enabled in the Advanced WAF policyInspect the Application Security Manager policy configuration for the affected virtual server. Look for SSRF protection settings within the security policy. This can be viewed via the management UI under Security > Application Security > Policies or via tmsh command 'tmsh list apm policy' if SSRF protection is exposed there.Affected if SSRF protection is enabled and configured in the active security policy for any virtual server
-
Check if NGINX App Protect Bot Defense is enabledIf using NGINX Plus with App Protect, verify whether the Bot Defense module is loaded and active in the NGINX configuration. Look for 'app_protect_enable' directive or 'include /etc/nginx/nginx.conf;' referencing bot defense policy files.Affected if App Protect Bot Defense is enabled in the NGINX configuration for any served virtual server
You are affected if your BIG-IP version is between 17.1.0 and 17.1.2 (exclusive) AND either Advanced WAF with SSRF protection or NGINX with App Protect Bot Defense is actively protecting traffic.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped17.1.2
Apply available patches or updates from F5 and NGINX for the affected products. If patches are unavailable, consider disabling SSRF protection temporarily or reviewing App Protect Bot Defense configuration to mitigate request disruption.
BIG-IP 17.1.2 or later
- 1. Verify current BIG-IP version is in affected range (17.1.0 - 17.1.1) using 'tmsh show sys version' command
- 2. Review F5 release notes for version 17.1.2 for any known issues or special upgrade considerations
- 3. Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade
- 4. Create a full backup of BIG-IP configuration using 'tmsh save sys config'
- 5. Download BIG-IP version 17.1.2 or later from F5 Downloads (my.f5.com)
- 6. Upload and install the upgrade via BIG-IP GUI (System > Software Management > ISO Image) or via tmsh
- 7. After reboot, verify the upgrade was successful and confirm WAF/ASM protection is functioning properly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-58474 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-58474 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data