CVE-2025-59116
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWindu CMS is vulnerable to User Enumeration. This issue occurs during logon, where a difference in messages could allow an attacker to determine if the login is valid or not, enabling a brute force attack with valid logins. Only version 4.1 was tested and confirmed as vulnerable. This issue was fixed in version 4.1 build 2250.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceWindu CMS 4.1 is vulnerable to user enumeration during the login process. The application returns different responses or error messages for valid versus invalid usernames, allowing unauthenticated attackers to discover valid user accounts in the system through simple probing. This information can then be used to focus brute-force attacks on valid accounts.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Windu CMS versionAccess the admin panel, footer, or system information page to identify the installed version number. Compare against version 4.1.Affected if The installed version is exactly 4.1 (or a build earlier than 2250 if build number is visible)
-
Locate the login pageNavigate to the login endpoint (typically /admin or /login) on the Windu CMS installation.Affected if The login page is accessible without authentication
-
Test error message for invalid usernameSubmit a login attempt with a clearly invalid/random username that does not exist in the system. Note the exact error message returned.Affected if An error message is returned (such as 'user not found' or 'invalid username')
-
Test error message for valid usernameSubmit a login attempt with a valid username (if known) but incorrect password. Note the exact error message returned and compare to step 3.Affected if The error message for valid username differs from the invalid username case (e.g., 'invalid password' vs 'user not found')
-
Check for timing differencesObserve if response times differ between valid and invalid username attempts, or if the application behaves differently in other measurable ways.Affected if The application responds differently (timing, message content, or behavior) based on username validity
If running Windu CMS version 4.1 and the login page returns distinguishable messages for valid versus invalid usernames, the environment is affected by this user enumeration vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Windu CMS to version 4.1 build 2250 or later, which contains the fix for this user enumeration vulnerability.
Windu CMS version 4.1 build 2250
- Obtain Windu CMS version 4.1 build 2250 from the official vendor (windu.org) or your existing update channel
- Backup your current Windu CMS installation and database before proceeding
- Replace the existing Windu CMS files with the new version 4.1 build 2250 files
- Verify the installation by attempting to log in with test accounts
- Confirm the login messages no longer differ between valid and invalid usernames (both should return the same error message)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-59116 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-59116 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data