CVE-2025-59465
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA malformed `HTTP/2 HEADERS` frame with oversized, invalid `HPACK` data can cause Node.js to crash by triggering an unhandled `TLSSocket` error `ECONNRESET`. Instead of safely closing the connection, the process crashes, enabling a remote denial of service. This primarily affects applications that do not attach explicit error handlers to secure sockets, for example: ``` server.on('secureConnection', socket => { socket.on('error', err => { console.log(err) }) }) ```
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceNode.js HTTP/2 implementation fails to handle malformed HEADERS frames with oversized, invalid HPACK data, triggering an unhandled TLSSocket ECONNRESET error that crashes the process. This is a denial-of-service vulnerability affecting Node.js servers using HTTP/2 over TLS without proper error handlers on secure sockets.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 20.0.0, < 20.20.0>= 22.0.0, < 22.22.0>= 24.0.0, < 24.13.0>= 25.0.0, < 25.3.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Node.js versionRun 'node --version' to get the installed Node.js versionAffected if Version falls within >= 20.0.0 and < 20.20.0, OR >= 22.0.0 and < 22.22.0, OR >= 24.0.0 and < 24.13.0, OR >= 25.0.0 and < 25.3.0
-
Identify HTTP/2 usageSearch codebase for require('http2') or usage of http2.createSecureServer, or check if the application serves HTTP/2 over TLSAffected if Application uses http2.createSecureServer or http2 over TLS connections
-
Check for secure socket error handlersSearch for .on('error', ...) or .addListener('error', ...) calls on TLSSocket or secure connection objects, particularly within 'secureConnection' event handlersAffected if No explicit error event handler is attached to secure sockets handling HTTP/2 traffic
-
Verify TLS is in useConfirm the HTTP/2 server is configured with TLS/HTTPS (check server options for key/cert or https module usage)Affected if HTTP/2 runs over TLS (h2 or h2c protocol)
If the Node.js version is in the affected range, HTTP/2 over TLS is in use, and no error handlers are attached to secure sockets, the application is vulnerable to process crashes from malformed HEADERS frames.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped20.20.022.22.024.13.0
Upgrade Node.js to the patched version or ensure all secure connections have explicit error handlers attached to prevent unhandled TLSSocket errors from crashing the process.
Node.js 20.20.0, 22.22.0, 24.13.0, or 25.3.0 (depending on your major version line)
- Identify your current Node.js version by running 'node --version'
- Determine which major version line you are using (20.x, 22.x, 24.x, or 25.x)
- For Node.js 20.x users: Upgrade to version 20.20.0 or later
- For Node.js 22.x users: Upgrade to version 22.22.0 or later
- For Node.js 24.x users: Upgrade to version 24.13.0 or later
- For Node.js 25.x users: Upgrade to version 25.3.0 or later
- Use a version manager like nvm to switch versions: 'nvm install <fixed_version>' and 'nvm use <fixed_version>','Verify the upgrade was successful by running 'node --version'
- Test your application to ensure it functions correctly with the new version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-59465 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- nodejs.org
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- security.access.redhat.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-59465 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data