CVE-2025-59737
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOperating system command injection vulnerability in AndSoft's e-TMS v25.03. This vulnerability allows an attacker to execute operating system commands on the server by sending a POST request. The relationship between parameter and assigned identifier is a 'm' parameter in '/clt/LOGINFRM_LXA.ASP'.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAndSoft e-TMS v25.03 contains an OS command injection vulnerability in the login form at /clt/LOGINFRM_LXA.ASP. The 'm' parameter in POST requests is not properly sanitized before being passed to a system call, allowing an attacker to inject arbitrary operating system commands. This is a critical pre-authentication flaw enabling complete server compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 25.03CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed e-TMS versionCheck the application banner, about page, or software inventory for AndSoft e-TMS version number. Look in installed programs list, application headers, or contact the vendor for version confirmation.Affected if Version is exactly 25.03
-
Verify vulnerable endpoint existsAttempt to access the URL path /clt/LOGINFRM_LXA.ASP via HTTP/HTTPS. A 200 or similar response indicates the endpoint is present.Affected if The endpoint returns a valid login form response
-
Confirm 'm' parameter is processedSend a POST request to /clt/LOGINFRM_LXA.ASP with the 'm' parameter present in the body. Check if the parameter value is reflected in server response or if there is any observable processing.Affected if The 'm' parameter is accepted and processed by the application without validation errors
-
Inspect application logs for exploitation attemptsReview web server access logs and application logs for unusual commands or shell metacharacters passed through the 'm' parameter in POST requests to /clt/LOGINFRM_LXA.ASP.Affected if Logs show command injection attempts or unexpected shell command execution related to this endpoint
If AndSoft e-TMS version 25.03 is installed and the /clt/LOGINFRM_LXA.ASP login endpoint is accessible, the system is vulnerable to pre-authentication OS command injection via the 'm' parameter.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict input validation to reject any shell metacharacters in the 'm' parameter, or refactor the code to remove the system call entirely and use parameterized/safer alternatives. Apply the vendor patch immediately once available.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-59737 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-59737 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data