CVE-2025-59741
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOperating system command injection vulnerability in AndSoft's e-TMS v25.03. This vulnerability allows an attacker to execute operating system commands on the server by sending a POST request. The relationship between parameter and assigned identifier is a 'm' parameter in '/CLT/LOGINERRORFRM.ASP'.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA critical OS command injection vulnerability exists in AndSoft e-TMS v25.03 where the 'm' parameter in the /CLT/LOGINERRORFRM.ASP endpoint accepts unsanitized user input that gets passed to system shell commands. An attacker can send a crafted POST request with malicious command payloads in the 'm' parameter to execute arbitrary OS commands on the server with the web application's privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 25.03CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm AndSoft e-TMS versionLocate the application version information in the web interface header, footer, or about page. Alternatively, check the HTTP headers or any version disclosure in the application's response. Compare against the affected version 25.03.Affected if The installed version is AndSoft e-TMS version 25.03 exactly.
-
Verify the vulnerable endpoint existsSend a GET or POST request to /CLT/LOGINERRORFRM.ASP on the target server. Check if the endpoint responds (even with an error) indicating the page exists.Affected if The /CLT/LOGINERRORFRM.ASP endpoint is accessible and responds to requests.
-
Test 'm' parameter processingSend a POST request to /CLT/LOGINERRORFRM.ASP with a benign test value in the 'm' parameter (e.g., m=test123). Observe the server response for any indication that the parameter is processed or reflected back.Affected if The 'm' parameter is accepted and processed by the application without immediate rejection.
-
Inspect web server logs for command injection attemptsReview access logs for /CLT/LOGINERRORFRM.ASP requests where the 'm' parameter contains shell metacharacters like ; | & $ ` ( ) { } [ ] < > " ' \n \r or other command injection patterns.Affected if Log analysis reveals requests with shell metacharacters in the 'm' parameter, indicating exploitation attempts.
A user is affected if they are running AndSoft e-TMS version 25.03 and the /CLT/LOGINERRORFRM.ASP endpoint is accessible and processes the 'm' parameter.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict input validation and sanitization on all parameters, particularly the 'm' parameter, to reject any shell metacharacters. Prefer whitelist-based validation and avoid passing user input to system calls. If possible, apply vendor patches or update to a patched version of e-TMS.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-59741 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-59741 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data