Claude CodeApplication · Anthropic

CVE-2025-59828

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-09-24
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.0.39 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Claude Code is an agentic coding tool. Prior to Claude Code version 1.0.39, when using Claude Code with Yarn versions 2.0+, Yarn plugins are auto-executed when running yarn --version. This could lead to a bypass of the directory trust dialog in Claude Code, as plugins would be executed prior to the user accepting the risks of working in an untrusted directory. Users running Yarn Classic were unaffected by this issue. This issue has been fixed in version 1.0.39. Users on standard Claude Code auto-update will have received this fix automatically. Users performing manual updates are advised to update to the latest version.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

In Claude Code versions before 1.0.39, Yarn 2.0+ plugins auto-execute when running yarn --version, which bypasses the directory trust dialog that normally requires user acknowledgment before running code in an untrusted directory. This allows potentially malicious code execution in untrusted directories without user consent.

MitigationUpdate Claude Code to version 1.0.39 or later to receive the fix; users with auto-update enabled should have already received this patch.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Claude CodeApplication
Affected:< 1.0.39

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check Claude Code version
    Run `claude --version` in your terminal to see the installed version of Claude Code
    Affected if Version is lower than 1.0.39 (for example, 1.0.38, 1.0.37, etc.)
  2. Verify Yarn 2.0+ plugin presence
    Look for a yarn.config.js, yarn.config.ts, or .yarnrc.yml file in your project directory, or check if you have any @yarnpkg/ scoped packages installed locally
    Affected if You have Yarn 2.0+ (Berry) configured or use Yarn 2.0+ plugins in your project and Claude Code version is below 1.0.39
  3. Check auto-update status
    Look at your Claude Code settings or startup messages to see if auto-update is enabled and which version is currently running
    Affected if Auto-update is disabled or failed and the running version is below 1.0.39

You are affected if Claude Code version is below 1.0.39 and you work with Yarn 2.0+ projects, as the directory trust dialog can be bypassed when running yarn --version.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.0.39 or later
Fixed in 1.0.39
Interim mitigation

Update Claude Code to version 1.0.39 or later to receive the fix; users with auto-update enabled should have already received this patch.

Recommended fix High confidence

1.0.39

  1. Ensure Claude Code is updated to version 1.0.39 or later
  2. For auto-update users: Verify the update has been applied by checking the Claude Code version
  3. For manual update users: Download and install the latest Claude Code version from the official source
  4. After updating, verify the fix by running yarn --version in a directory to confirm plugins no longer execute before the trust dialog appears

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Claude Code Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,060
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-59828 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-59828 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data