CVE-2026-39861
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedClaude Code is an agentic coding tool. Prior to version 2.1.64, Claude Code's sandbox did not prevent sandboxed processes from creating symlinks pointing to locations outside the workspace. When Claude Code subsequently wrote to a path within such a symlink, its unsandboxed process followed the symlink and wrote to the target location outside the workspace without prompting the user for confirmation. This allowed a sandbox escape where neither the sandboxed command nor the unsandboxed app could independently write outside the workspace, but their combination could write to arbitrary locations, potentially leading to code execution outside the sandbox. Reliably exploiting this required the ability to add untrusted content into a Claude Code context window to trigger sandboxed code execution via prompt injection. Users on standard Claude Code auto-update have received this fix automatically. Users performing manual updates are advised to update to version 2.1.64 or later.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceClaude Code versions before 2.1.64 had a sandbox escape vulnerability where sandboxed processes could create symlinks pointing outside the workspace. When the unsandboxed Claude Code process subsequently wrote to paths within these symlinks, it would follow them and write to arbitrary locations outside the workspace without user confirmation, enabling code execution outside the sandbox.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.1.64CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Claude Code installationCheck if Claude Code CLI is installed by running 'claude --version' or 'claude -v' in the terminalAffected if Claude Code is not installed - not affected; if installed, proceed to version check
-
Determine installed Claude Code versionRun 'claude --version' and note the version number displayed (format typically shows like 'Claude Code 2.1.x')Affected if Unable to determine version - manual review required
-
Compare version against affected rangeCompare the installed version number to 2.1.64 - versions before 2.1.64 are affected (e.g., 2.1.63, 2.1.60, etc.)Affected if Version is less than 2.1.64 (e.g., 2.1.63 or earlier) - environment is affected by this CVE
-
Check if sandbox feature is usedDetermine if Claude Code sandbox mode is enabled - review Claude Code configuration files or check if sandboxed tool execution is in use (check for sandbox-related flags or settings in Claude Code config)Affected if Sandbox mode is not used - the specific exploitation path may not apply, but the vulnerable binary still exists
-
Verify patch applied via update mechanismRun 'claude --version' again to confirm the current version after any updates, or check the application bundle/install location for version metadataAffected if Version remains below 2.1.64 after checking - vulnerable and requires update
A system is affected if Claude Code is installed with a version lower than 2.1.64 and the sandbox feature is in use, allowing symlink-based escape to write outside the workspace.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.1.64
Update Claude Code to version 2.1.64 or later. Users on standard auto-update have received the fix automatically; manual update users must apply the update explicitly.
2.1.64
- Check current Claude Code version by running 'claude --version' in terminal
- Update Claude Code to version 2.1.64 or later
- For auto-update users: ensure auto-update is enabled or run the update command for your installation method
- For manual users: download and install Claude Code 2.1.64 from the official Anthropic repository
- Verify the installed version is 2.1.64 or higher using 'claude --version'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing0.5 h
- Review / QA0.5 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-39861 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-39861 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data