CVE-2025-59896
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSync Breeze Enterprise Server v10.4.18 and Disk Pulse Enterprise v10.4.18 contain a persistent authenticated Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could send malicious content to an authenticated user and steal information from their session due to insufficient validation of user input in '/add_command?sid=', affecting the 'command_name' parameter.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidencePersistent authenticated XSS vulnerability in Sync Breeze Enterprise Server v10.4.18 and Disk Pulse Enterprise v10.4.18 allows authenticated attackers to inject malicious scripts via the 'command_name' parameter in the '/add_command?sid=' endpoint. The injected payload persists and can be executed in other users' sessions, enabling session hijacking and information theft.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 10.4.18= 10.4.18CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed product and versionCheck the installed version of Flexense Diskpulse or Syncbreeze Enterprise by reviewing installed software details, checking the application's About/Help section, or querying the service banner. For Disk Pulse, check the DiskPulse.exe properties or service info. For Sync Breeze, check SyncBreeze.exe properties or service info.Affected if Version is exactly 10.4.18 for either Diskpulse or Syncbreeze Enterprise
-
Confirm enterprise edition is in useVerify the installed edition is the Enterprise version, as only Enterprise editions include the '/add_command' endpoint with command management features. Check the product name displayed in the application or service description.Affected if The installed product is Disk Pulse Enterprise or Sync Breeze Enterprise version 10.4.18 (not Standard or Professional editions)
-
Verify the web interface is enabledDetermine if the HTTP/HTTPS web management interface is enabled. Check Windows services for DiskPulse or SyncBreeze web service status, or review the application configuration for web server binding settings.Affected if The web management interface is enabled and accessible on the configured port (default varies by product)
-
Confirm authentication is active but exploitableReview the web interface authentication configuration to confirm user accounts are configured. The vulnerability requires an authenticated session to access the '/add_command?sid=' endpoint, but the XSS persists across sessions.Affected if User authentication is configured for the web interface, allowing login to obtain a session ID (sid)
-
Inspect web server logs for suspicious add_command activityReview HTTP access logs for the application (typically in the product's log directory) for entries involving POST or GET requests to '/add_command' with unusual command_name parameter values containing script tags or encoded characters.Affected if Log entries show requests to /add_command with potentially malicious command_name values that were successfully processed
You are affected if running Disk Pulse Enterprise or Sync Breeze Enterprise version 10.4.18 with the web interface enabled and authentication configured, allowing access to the vulnerable /add_command endpoint.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict input validation and context-aware output encoding for the 'command_name' parameter; add Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to mitigate XSS execution; consider implementing CSRF tokens for state-changing operations.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,848.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-59896 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-59896 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data