CVE-2025-61591
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCursor is a code editor built for programming with AI. In versions 1.7 and below, when MCP uses OAuth authentication with an untrusted MCP server, an attacker can impersonate a malicious MCP server and return crafted, maliciously injected commands during the interaction process, leading to command injection and potential remote code execution. If chained with an untrusted MCP service via OAuth, this command injection vulnerability could allow arbitrary code execution on the host by the agent. This can then be used to directly compromise the system by executing malicious commands with full user privileges. This issue does not currently have a fixed release version, but there is a patch, 2025.09.17-25b418f.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCursor's MCP (Model Context Protocol) OAuth authentication flow in version 1.7 and below fails to properly validate server identity, allowing an attacker impersonating a malicious MCP server to inject arbitrary commands during the OAuth interaction. This command injection vulnerability enables an attacker to achieve remote code execution with the full privileges of the user running Cursor.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Cursor versionOpen Cursor, go to Help > About, or check the application metadata. On macOS this may be in /Applications/Cursor.app/Contents/Info.plist. On Windows check the file properties of Cursor.exe.Affected if The version is 1.7 or lower (1.7, 1.6.x, 1.5.x, etc.)
-
Verify MCP feature is in useCheck if Model Context Protocol (MCP) is configured in Cursor. Look in Cursor settings for MCP server configurations, typically found under Settings > Extensions > MCP or similar extension/AI settings areas.Affected if MCP servers or extensions are configured and actively in use within Cursor
-
Review MCP OAuth configurationsInspect Cursor's configuration files for MCP server entries. Check user-level config directories such as ~/.cursor/ or %APPDATA%/Cursor/ for files containing 'mcp' or 'MCP' references, especially those with OAuth or server URL settings.Affected if MCP server entries with OAuth authentication URLs are present in the configuration
-
Check for untrusted MCP serversReview the list of configured MCP servers and their associated URLs. Identify any servers that are not from known, trusted sources or that use HTTP instead of HTTPS for OAuth endpoints.Affected if Any MCP server points to an unverified or non-https endpoint, indicating potential exposure to the vulnerability
A user is affected if they are running Cursor version 1.7 or below AND have an MCP server configured with OAuth authentication, particularly one pointing to an untrusted or improperly secured endpoint.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor patch (version 2025.09.17-25b418f or later) to Cursor. Until patched, avoid connecting Cursor's MCP to untrusted servers and only use verified, trusted MCP services for OAuth authentication.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-61591 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-61591 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data